We have located links that may give you full text access.
Eyelid metrics assessment in patients with chronic ocular graft versus-host disease.
Ocular Surface 2018 October 13
PURPOSE: To assess eyelid metrics in the setting of chronic ocular graft versus-host disease (oGVHD), and to further correlate them with hematological and ocular characteristics.
METHODS: Prospective case-control study conducted at a single tertiary-referred Center. The following eyelid tests were performed in oGVHD patients and control subjects: vertical lid pull; anterior/lower distraction; lateral/medial distraction; distance between lateral canthal angle and orbital rim; margin reflex distances (MRD) 1 and 2; duration of tarsus exposure; snap back. Correlations of eyelid metrics with hematological and ocular parameters in the oGVHD group were performed.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with oGVHD and 27 healthy matched subjects were finally included. Significantly higher values of vertical lid pull, anterior/lower distraction, lateral/medial distraction, and distance between lateral canthal angle and orbital rim were found in the oGVHD group compared to controls (always p < 0.02). Conversely, MRD1 was lower in oGVHD patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). Duration of tarsus exposure and snap back test were pathological in a higher percentage in oGVHD group compared to controls (respectively 66.7 and 59.3% vs 33.3 and 25.9%; p < 0.005). Vertical lid pull test was significantly higher in oGVHD patients with superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (13.8 ± 2.4 vs 10.9 ± 2.4, p = 0.010). Ocular GVHD patients with subtarsal fibrosis had a higher percentage of pathological values for duration of tarsus exposure test (77.3 vs 20.0%; p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlighted for the first time higher eyelid laxity in oGVHD patients. This intriguing association may add a further piece to the puzzle of clinical features occurring in the setting of oGVHD.
METHODS: Prospective case-control study conducted at a single tertiary-referred Center. The following eyelid tests were performed in oGVHD patients and control subjects: vertical lid pull; anterior/lower distraction; lateral/medial distraction; distance between lateral canthal angle and orbital rim; margin reflex distances (MRD) 1 and 2; duration of tarsus exposure; snap back. Correlations of eyelid metrics with hematological and ocular parameters in the oGVHD group were performed.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with oGVHD and 27 healthy matched subjects were finally included. Significantly higher values of vertical lid pull, anterior/lower distraction, lateral/medial distraction, and distance between lateral canthal angle and orbital rim were found in the oGVHD group compared to controls (always p < 0.02). Conversely, MRD1 was lower in oGVHD patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). Duration of tarsus exposure and snap back test were pathological in a higher percentage in oGVHD group compared to controls (respectively 66.7 and 59.3% vs 33.3 and 25.9%; p < 0.005). Vertical lid pull test was significantly higher in oGVHD patients with superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (13.8 ± 2.4 vs 10.9 ± 2.4, p = 0.010). Ocular GVHD patients with subtarsal fibrosis had a higher percentage of pathological values for duration of tarsus exposure test (77.3 vs 20.0%; p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlighted for the first time higher eyelid laxity in oGVHD patients. This intriguing association may add a further piece to the puzzle of clinical features occurring in the setting of oGVHD.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app