Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of quality of sleep between medical and non-medical undergraduate Pakistani students.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of sleep between medical and non-medical undergraduate students.

METHODS: The comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from March to May 2017 at different universities and colleges of Rawalpindi/Islamabad cities in Pakistan. Pittsburgh sleep quality index questionnaire was distributed among undergraduate students. Comparison was made between the global and component scores of medical and non-medical students. Excel 2013 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS: Of the 606 students approached, 520(85.8%) responded. Among them, 266(51.1%) were medical students and 254(48.9%) were non-medical. Also, 327(62.9%) were females and 193(37.1%) males. Overall mean age of the subjects was 20.25±1.54 years. Among the medical students, 179(67.3%) and among the non-medical 128(50.4%) subjects were classified as poor sleepers with mean score of 6.386 ± 2.923. The scores were significantly higher among medical students, indicating poorer sleep quality and were higher still among female medical students (p<0.05). However, no gender difference was found among non-medical students.

CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of Pakistani undergraduate students have disturbed sleep patterns that tend to deteriorate further among medical students.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app