Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Differences in glucose metabolism among women with spinal cord injury may not be fully explained by variations in body composition.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in glucose metabolism among women with paraplegic, and tetraplegic spinal cord injury (SCI) in comparison to their able-bodied (AB) counterparts after adjusting for differences in body composition.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Following an overnight fast, each participant consumed a 75-g glucose solution for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were analyzed before and 30-, 60-, and 120-minute post-consumption. Insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was estimated using the Matsuda index. Percentage fat mass (%FM) and total body lean mass (TBLM) were estimated using data from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Visceral fat (VF) was quantified using computerized tomography. Outcome measures were compared among groups using ANCOVA with %FM (or VF) and TBLM as covariates.

SETTING: Research University PARTICIPANTS: Women with SCI (tetraplegia: n=8; paraplegia: n=14) and their race-, body mass index- and age-matched AB counterparts (n=20).

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

RESULTS: At fasting, there was no difference in glucose homeostasis (glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations) among 3 groups of women. In contrast, glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations at OGTT 120 min were higher in women with tetraplegia vs. women with paraplegia and AB women (P < 0.05, adjusted for TBLM and %FM). In addition, women with tetraplegia had lower ISI (P < 0.05, adjusted for TBLM and %FM) vs. AB women. These differences remained after adjusting for VF and TBLM.

CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that impaired glucose metabolism among women with tetraplegia may not be fully explained by changes in their body composition. Future studies exploring additional factors involved in glucose metabolism are warranted.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app