Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The Risk of the Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus In Patients With Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms treated by endovascular coiling or surgical clipping: an update meta-analysis.

World Neurosurgery 2018 October 9
BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus among patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with either coil placement or clipping.

METHODS: A systematic literature search of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to confirm relevant studies. The scientific literature was screened in accordance with the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment and data extraction from the eligible studies, a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata SE 12.0.

RESULTS: Thirteen studies met all the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. In total, these studies included 13751 patients. 8444 of them underwent neurosurgical clipping, and 5307 underwent endovascular coiling. The overall result of a pooled estimate revealed that there was no statistically significant risk of shunt dependency difference between the clipping and coiling groups (11.4% versus 12.0%; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.01). Six prospective studies (1373 patients) reporting shunt-dependent hydrocephalus revealed no significant difference between clipping and coiling (23.3% versus 20.1%; RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38). Seven retrospective studies (12378 patients) reporting shunt-dependent hydrocephalus found statistical significance between the surgical and endovascular treatment groups (10.0% versus 11.1%; RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms are associated with similar incidences of ventricular shunt placement for hydrocephalus. The risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is not higher after coiling than after clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app