Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Association of self-reported and cotinine-verified smoking status with incidence of metabolic syndrome in 47,379 Korean Adults.

Journal of Diabetes 2018 October 12
BACKGROUND: No study has reported the relationship of cotinine-verified vs. self-reported smoking status with incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS). The aim of this study is to determine the effect of urinary cotinine-verified vs. self-reported smoking status on incident metabolic syndrome.

METHODS: A total of 47,379 participants without MetS who visited between 2011 and 2012 at baseline were included and followed up at 2014. Median follow-up duration was 25 months. Cotinine-verified current smoking was defined as urinary cotinine level of above 50 ng/mL. According to their cotinine-verified smoking status at baseline and at follow-up, individuals were divided into four groups: never, new, former, and sustained smoking.

RESULTS: Incidences of MetS in never, former, new, and sustained smoking groups were 9.9%, 19.4%, 21.4%, and 18.7%, respectively. Multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses for the four groups revealed that the relative risk (RR) for incident MetS in cotinine-verified former smoking group was significantly increased compared to that in cotinine-verified never smoking group (RR[95% CI], 1.27[1.16, 1.37]), especially in the individuals with weight gain (≥2kg). These results were consistent with those of self-reported smoking groups. Baseline cotinine-verified current smoking (1.09[1.03, 1.15]) and self-reported former (1.10[1.02, 1.18]) and current (1.15[1.07, 1.23]) smoking were also significantly associated with incident MetS.

CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study showed that cotinine-verified and self-reported former smoking during follow-up increased the risk for incident MetS, especially in individuals with weight gain (≥2kg). This finding suggests that weight control in former smokers would be very important to reduce the development of MetS.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app