We have located links that may give you full text access.
Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with Preservation of Splenic Vessels: An Inferior-Posterior Approach.
Objective: To summarize the operation experience of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with preservation of splenic vessels by an inferior-posterior dissection of the pancreatic body and evaluate its feasibility.
Methods: Patients undergoing LSPDS at Ningbo Li Huili Hospital and Ningbo Li Huili Eastern Hospital from January 2014 to April 2017 were recruited in this study and were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the inferior-posterior approach group and the other approach group. We sought to compare outcomes of the two groups.
Results: The LSPDP procedure was completed successfully in 49 cases, and 48 patients had their splenic artery and vein preserved, including 26 cases in the inferior-posterior approach group and 22 cases in the other approach group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age ( p = 0.18), sex ( p = 0.56), preoperative diabetes ( p = 1.00), ASA grading ( p = 1.00), tumor size ( p = 0.91), intraoperative blood loss ( t = -0.01, p = 0.99), hospital stay ( t = -0.02, p = 0.98), and pancreatic fistula rates ( p = 1.00). Patients undergoing LSPDP by the inferior-posterior approach had a shorter operative time ( t = -4.13, p < 0.001) than the other approach group.
Conclusions: LSPDS by the inferior-posterior approach associated with shorter operative time is safe and feasible.
Methods: Patients undergoing LSPDS at Ningbo Li Huili Hospital and Ningbo Li Huili Eastern Hospital from January 2014 to April 2017 were recruited in this study and were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the inferior-posterior approach group and the other approach group. We sought to compare outcomes of the two groups.
Results: The LSPDP procedure was completed successfully in 49 cases, and 48 patients had their splenic artery and vein preserved, including 26 cases in the inferior-posterior approach group and 22 cases in the other approach group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age ( p = 0.18), sex ( p = 0.56), preoperative diabetes ( p = 1.00), ASA grading ( p = 1.00), tumor size ( p = 0.91), intraoperative blood loss ( t = -0.01, p = 0.99), hospital stay ( t = -0.02, p = 0.98), and pancreatic fistula rates ( p = 1.00). Patients undergoing LSPDP by the inferior-posterior approach had a shorter operative time ( t = -4.13, p < 0.001) than the other approach group.
Conclusions: LSPDS by the inferior-posterior approach associated with shorter operative time is safe and feasible.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app