We have located links that may give you full text access.
Do temporal scores of motivational constructs correspond with physical activity levels?
Disability and Health Journal 2018 September 29
BACKGROUND: Adults with physical disabilities typically engage in low levels of physical activity (PA), thus a better understanding of how motivational factors and behavior vary over time and in relation to disability type and severity is needed.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To examine temporal changes in theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs and PA by disability type (multiple sclerosis vs. spinal cord injury) and severity (mild, moderate, and severe).
METHODS: Participants were 77 adults with physical disabilities who completed a web-based survey that assessed the TPB constructs and PA participation. The survey was completed once every four months for a total of three time points. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine if the TPB constructs and PA changed over time and in relation to disability type and severity.
RESULTS: There was only one significant between-subjects effect for PA by disability severity, F (2, 68) = 5.94, p = .004, η2 = 15%. People with mild disabilities exhibited higher mean PA participation over the three time periods (M = 21.06 ± 11.49 MET-hrs/day) than those with moderate disabilities (M = 11.27 ± 9.3 MET-hrs/day) and severe disabilities (M = 13.43 ± 14.74 MET-hrs/day).
CONCLUSIONS: Although participants possessed positive PA motivational factors that remained stable over time, their PA participation was low and differed as a function of disability severity. Therefore, PA interventions should be tailored such that individuals with severe disabilities receive the greatest amount of exercise prescription consultations and supervision compared to those with more moderate and mild disabilities.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To examine temporal changes in theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs and PA by disability type (multiple sclerosis vs. spinal cord injury) and severity (mild, moderate, and severe).
METHODS: Participants were 77 adults with physical disabilities who completed a web-based survey that assessed the TPB constructs and PA participation. The survey was completed once every four months for a total of three time points. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine if the TPB constructs and PA changed over time and in relation to disability type and severity.
RESULTS: There was only one significant between-subjects effect for PA by disability severity, F (2, 68) = 5.94, p = .004, η2 = 15%. People with mild disabilities exhibited higher mean PA participation over the three time periods (M = 21.06 ± 11.49 MET-hrs/day) than those with moderate disabilities (M = 11.27 ± 9.3 MET-hrs/day) and severe disabilities (M = 13.43 ± 14.74 MET-hrs/day).
CONCLUSIONS: Although participants possessed positive PA motivational factors that remained stable over time, their PA participation was low and differed as a function of disability severity. Therefore, PA interventions should be tailored such that individuals with severe disabilities receive the greatest amount of exercise prescription consultations and supervision compared to those with more moderate and mild disabilities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app