We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Predictors of mucosal melanoma survival in a population-based setting.
BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanomas are rare and aggressive neoplasms, with little published population-based data on predictors of survival.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the influences of race/ethnicity, sex, tumor stage, tumor thickness, and anatomic site on mucosal melanoma survival estimates.
METHODS: We analyzed 132,751 cases of melanoma, including 1824 mucosal melanomas, diagnosed between 1994 and 2015 and reported to the California Cancer Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the prognostic variables.
RESULTS: The 5-year relative survival for mucosal melanomas (27.64% [95% confidence interval {CI} 25.42-29.91) was significantly lower than for cutaneous melanomas (76.28% [95% CI 76.03-76.53]). Stage independently influenced survival, and thickness did not predict survival for neoplasms of known depth. Less common anatomic sites conferred worse prognoses (hazard ratio 1.93 [95% CI 1.41-2.64]).
LIMITATIONS: The lack of a standardized staging system may have resulted in misclassification of stage for some neoplasms. The influence of genetics is unknown because our database did not contain genetic characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Stage and anatomic site, but not thickness (ie, Breslow depth), race, or ethnicity, determine the prognosis of mucosal melanomas. Considering the poor prognosis for all stages of mucosal melanoma, dermatologists should incorporate examination of the oropharynx and genitalia in the full body skin examination.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the influences of race/ethnicity, sex, tumor stage, tumor thickness, and anatomic site on mucosal melanoma survival estimates.
METHODS: We analyzed 132,751 cases of melanoma, including 1824 mucosal melanomas, diagnosed between 1994 and 2015 and reported to the California Cancer Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the prognostic variables.
RESULTS: The 5-year relative survival for mucosal melanomas (27.64% [95% confidence interval {CI} 25.42-29.91) was significantly lower than for cutaneous melanomas (76.28% [95% CI 76.03-76.53]). Stage independently influenced survival, and thickness did not predict survival for neoplasms of known depth. Less common anatomic sites conferred worse prognoses (hazard ratio 1.93 [95% CI 1.41-2.64]).
LIMITATIONS: The lack of a standardized staging system may have resulted in misclassification of stage for some neoplasms. The influence of genetics is unknown because our database did not contain genetic characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Stage and anatomic site, but not thickness (ie, Breslow depth), race, or ethnicity, determine the prognosis of mucosal melanomas. Considering the poor prognosis for all stages of mucosal melanoma, dermatologists should incorporate examination of the oropharynx and genitalia in the full body skin examination.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app