ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Characteristics of bloodstream infections in adult patients of two third level centers of Córdoba, Argentina.]

Background: Bloodstream infections (BI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Objective: To determine epidemiological, microbiological and clinical features of community (CA-BI) and nosocomial bloodstream infections (N-BI).

Methods: Bacteremia and fungemia events were retrospectively analyzed in two third-level hospitals between April 2009 and August 2013.

Results: We identified 1150 events of bloodstream infections, 53.2% were CA-BI. Gram negative microorganisms were isolated in 61%. The most frequent pathogens were Escherichia coli in CA-BI and Klebsiella pneumoniae in N-BI. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent gram positive organism. The main comorbidities were renal disease (39%) and malignancy (38%). There were 26.8% of primary bloodstream infections, and the main infection foci included respiratory (17.04%) and urinary tract (16.86%). A high percentage of gram-negative bacteria of CA-BI and N-BI were resistance to ampicillin sulbactam (40.2% and 57.5%), cephalothin (36.7% and 46.8%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 32.8% vs 35.5%) and ciprofloxacin (24.6% and 35.3%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were more frequently into ITS-IH (31.4% vs 11.8%, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of CA-BI and N-BI were similar to those reported by other Latin-American studies. We observed some differences in antimicrobial resistance profiles. We emphasize the importance of local epidemiological surveillance to choose appropriate empirical treatments.

Conclusions: Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of CA-BI and N-BI were similar to those reported by other Latin-American studies. We observed some differences in antimicrobial resistance profiles. We emphasize the importance of local epidemiological surveillance to choose appropriate empirical treatments.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app