We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effects of a home based exercise rehabilitation program for cancer survivors.
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 October 2
BACKGROUND: Aerobic and resistance exercises have been promoted recently to improve quality of life in cancer patients. Most cancer survivorship rehabilitation programs consists of supervised exercise programs; however, less data is available on the effects of unsupervised or home-based exercise interventions. The study aimed to compare the physical and physiologic changes in a group of cancer survivors (CS) and a control group of non-cancer, health controls (HC) who participated in individualized home-based aerobic and resistance exercises for 12 months.
METHODS: Thirty-three surviving cancer survivors (CS) aged 55.6±3 y were enrolled for 1 year of unsupervised exercise prescription programs. Anthropometric parameters hydration status, fitness, and echocardiographic examination were measured every six month and compared to10 HC (aged 52.6 ± 7.7 y) individuals prior to starting the program (t0) and at 6 (t6) and 12 (t12) months.
RESULTS: Among the CS subjects a significant reductions in waist circumference t0: 97.5 ±15.2; t6: 86.6 ±13.5; t12: 85.8 ± 13.9, p<0.05; body cell mass% t0: 50.9±4.7; t6: 52.3±4.4; t12: 53.7±3.7; p<0.05 and extracellular mass %, t0: 49.1±4.7 t6; 47.6±4.4, t12: 46.2±3.7, p < 0.05, were observed as well significant improvements in lower body muscle strength (chair test t0:13.3±4.1, t6: 14.2±3.5, t12: 15.1±3.2; p<0.05). Changes in functionality and heart function were similar between CS and HC's.
CONCLUSIONS: Individually prescribed home-based exercise programs were cost effective, safe and resulted in modest improvements in body composition, strength, and total body water distribution with little to no adverse effect on cardiac function.
METHODS: Thirty-three surviving cancer survivors (CS) aged 55.6±3 y were enrolled for 1 year of unsupervised exercise prescription programs. Anthropometric parameters hydration status, fitness, and echocardiographic examination were measured every six month and compared to10 HC (aged 52.6 ± 7.7 y) individuals prior to starting the program (t0) and at 6 (t6) and 12 (t12) months.
RESULTS: Among the CS subjects a significant reductions in waist circumference t0: 97.5 ±15.2; t6: 86.6 ±13.5; t12: 85.8 ± 13.9, p<0.05; body cell mass% t0: 50.9±4.7; t6: 52.3±4.4; t12: 53.7±3.7; p<0.05 and extracellular mass %, t0: 49.1±4.7 t6; 47.6±4.4, t12: 46.2±3.7, p < 0.05, were observed as well significant improvements in lower body muscle strength (chair test t0:13.3±4.1, t6: 14.2±3.5, t12: 15.1±3.2; p<0.05). Changes in functionality and heart function were similar between CS and HC's.
CONCLUSIONS: Individually prescribed home-based exercise programs were cost effective, safe and resulted in modest improvements in body composition, strength, and total body water distribution with little to no adverse effect on cardiac function.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app