We have located links that may give you full text access.
Fric Test Revisited: A Suggestion for a New Scoring System and Its Correlation with Urticaria Control Test and Dermatology Life Quality Index.
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 2018 October 5
BACKGROUND: Fric test is a useful tool for the diagnosis and threshold testing for symptomatic dermographism. When threshold testing is not available, Urticaria Control Test (UCT) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) might be used to assess disease control and quality of life (QoL) impairment, respectively.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to describe a new scoring system for the Fric test and evaluate the correlations of Fric scores with UCT, DLQI, and other disease activity assessment scores.
METHOD: Provocation test with Fric Test 4.0 was performed in all patients at referral and at the 4th week. We considered a 4-grade rating score for Fric Test (0-4) [Total Fric Score (TFS)]. A positive response with all of the four pins suggested severe dermographism (TFS = 4), while a wheal with only the largest pin (4.5 mm) was considered as milder disease (TFS = 1). Treatment responses were evaluated with Fric Test 4.0, UCT, patient's global assessment of disease severity (PatGA-VAS), the physician's global assessment of disease control (PhyGA-VAS), and DLQI at baseline and at the 4th week of treatment. The correlations of TFS with UCT, DLQI, PatGA-VAS, PhyGA-VAS at baseline as well as the changes in the mean scores after treatment (week 4) were performed.
RESULTS: The mean UCT and DLQI scores were 8.69 ± 3.40 and 7.88 ± 6.02 at the first visit. At the second visit, TFS decreased from a mean of 2.79 ± 1.68 to 1.91 ± 1.85 (p < 0.001), and UCT scores and PhyGA-VAS were increased (p < 0.001), while DLQI scores, PatGA-VAS, and pruritus scores decreased significantly (p = 0.002; p = 0.001; p = 0.012). There was a positive correlation between TFS and pruritus scores (r = 0.378) and DLQI scores (r = 0.392). TFS was found to have a negative correlation with UCT score (r = -0.283) and PhyGA-VAS (r = -0.347).
CONCLUSIONS: This new Fric scoring system allows comparison with other tools and shows moderate correlations with most of the tools. Using disease-specific tools is recommended since they provide a subjective evaluation of disease severity, QoL impairment, and disease control.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to describe a new scoring system for the Fric test and evaluate the correlations of Fric scores with UCT, DLQI, and other disease activity assessment scores.
METHOD: Provocation test with Fric Test 4.0 was performed in all patients at referral and at the 4th week. We considered a 4-grade rating score for Fric Test (0-4) [Total Fric Score (TFS)]. A positive response with all of the four pins suggested severe dermographism (TFS = 4), while a wheal with only the largest pin (4.5 mm) was considered as milder disease (TFS = 1). Treatment responses were evaluated with Fric Test 4.0, UCT, patient's global assessment of disease severity (PatGA-VAS), the physician's global assessment of disease control (PhyGA-VAS), and DLQI at baseline and at the 4th week of treatment. The correlations of TFS with UCT, DLQI, PatGA-VAS, PhyGA-VAS at baseline as well as the changes in the mean scores after treatment (week 4) were performed.
RESULTS: The mean UCT and DLQI scores were 8.69 ± 3.40 and 7.88 ± 6.02 at the first visit. At the second visit, TFS decreased from a mean of 2.79 ± 1.68 to 1.91 ± 1.85 (p < 0.001), and UCT scores and PhyGA-VAS were increased (p < 0.001), while DLQI scores, PatGA-VAS, and pruritus scores decreased significantly (p = 0.002; p = 0.001; p = 0.012). There was a positive correlation between TFS and pruritus scores (r = 0.378) and DLQI scores (r = 0.392). TFS was found to have a negative correlation with UCT score (r = -0.283) and PhyGA-VAS (r = -0.347).
CONCLUSIONS: This new Fric scoring system allows comparison with other tools and shows moderate correlations with most of the tools. Using disease-specific tools is recommended since they provide a subjective evaluation of disease severity, QoL impairment, and disease control.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app