We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of videoendoscopic examinations of arytenoid function in the 2-year-old Thoroughbred: Can we all agree?
Equine Veterinary Journal 2018 October 4
BACKGROUND: Upper respiratory tract (URT) endoscopic examination is a routine part of prepurchase examinations. Discrepancies have been documented in the assessment of arytenoid function grades (AFG) between veterinarians.
OBJECTIVES: To document intra- and interobserver agreement for a population of multi-experience level veterinarians for assessment of AFG of 2-year-old Thoroughbreds.
STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
METHODS: One-hundred and fourteen URT videoendoscopic examinations were evaluated by 10 veterinarians. Veterinarians were categorised based on experience, into five groups, each group with two veterinarians. Arytenoid function was graded using the Havemeyer ordinal scale and then reclassified by the authors dichotomously into 'meets conditions of sale' (MCS) or 'does not meet conditions of sale'(DNMCS). Interobserver agreement of arytenoid function was assessed across all 10 veterinarians using Fleiss' kappa and between veterinarians of similar experience levels in the five subgroups using Cohen's unweighted (k) and Cohen's linear weighted kappa (Ck). Intraobserver agreement was similarly calculated for each reviewer using 22 repeated video clips.
RESULTS: Overall interobserver agreement using ordinal scales was fair (k = 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.31) to moderate (mean weighted Ck = 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.69) depending on statistical methodology used. Using the dichotomous classification, interobserver agreement was good (k = 0.7, 95% CI 0.63-0.77). Overall intraobserver agreement using ordinal scales was fair (mean k = 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.38) to good (mean Ck = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.71); and for the dichotomous reclassification it was good (k = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.87). Experience level differences were identified.
MAIN LIMITATIONS: The low number of veterinarians in each experience subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjectivity exists in arytenoid function grading, despite the existence of a well-defined scale. Agreement variation exists depending on the grading scales and statistical methods used for analysis. Future studies pre- and post veterinarian training are indicated to determine if agreement can be improved.
OBJECTIVES: To document intra- and interobserver agreement for a population of multi-experience level veterinarians for assessment of AFG of 2-year-old Thoroughbreds.
STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
METHODS: One-hundred and fourteen URT videoendoscopic examinations were evaluated by 10 veterinarians. Veterinarians were categorised based on experience, into five groups, each group with two veterinarians. Arytenoid function was graded using the Havemeyer ordinal scale and then reclassified by the authors dichotomously into 'meets conditions of sale' (MCS) or 'does not meet conditions of sale'(DNMCS). Interobserver agreement of arytenoid function was assessed across all 10 veterinarians using Fleiss' kappa and between veterinarians of similar experience levels in the five subgroups using Cohen's unweighted (k) and Cohen's linear weighted kappa (Ck). Intraobserver agreement was similarly calculated for each reviewer using 22 repeated video clips.
RESULTS: Overall interobserver agreement using ordinal scales was fair (k = 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.31) to moderate (mean weighted Ck = 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.69) depending on statistical methodology used. Using the dichotomous classification, interobserver agreement was good (k = 0.7, 95% CI 0.63-0.77). Overall intraobserver agreement using ordinal scales was fair (mean k = 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.38) to good (mean Ck = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.71); and for the dichotomous reclassification it was good (k = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.87). Experience level differences were identified.
MAIN LIMITATIONS: The low number of veterinarians in each experience subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjectivity exists in arytenoid function grading, despite the existence of a well-defined scale. Agreement variation exists depending on the grading scales and statistical methods used for analysis. Future studies pre- and post veterinarian training are indicated to determine if agreement can be improved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app