We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of vision screening in five- to eight-year-old children living in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden - a prospective multicentre study.
Acta Ophthalmologica 2018 October 3
PURPOSE: To evaluate the current vision screening criteria regarding amblyopia and refractive errors, with emphasis on screening limits and retesting, in Region Västra Götaland (VGR), Sweden. Visual acuity (VA) screening is performed by nurses at primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in 4-year-old children and at school in 6- or 7-year-old children. Children with VA <0.65 (>0.19 logMAR) at either eye are referred. If VA is 0.65 in one or both eyes, a retest is performed by nurses at PHCs and schools, the children are then referred if VA is <0.8 (>0.10 logMAR).
METHODS: We included all children aged ≥5 and <8 years referred between October 2014 and June 2015 from PHCs and schools to the four eye clinics in VGR, with VA ≥0.65 in one or both eyes. At the eye clinic, children underwent assessment of VA, refraction in cycloplegia, eye motility, cover test, stereo test and a slit lamp examination.
RESULTS: Among the 259/295 children (139 female) participating, median age was 5.7 years (5.0-7.8 years) at referral. Glasses were prescribed due to subnormal VA with refractive errors in 20% of the children, 22% displayed heterophoria, none had heterotropia and one younger child had amblyopia. Accurate retesting gave fewer false-positive referrals.
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that a vision screening referral cut-off limit of VA <0.65 would leave undetected refractive errors. Residual amblyopia was uncommon. Accurate referral criteria, retesting and training of those performing the screening as well as re-evaluation of the screening programme are all important.
METHODS: We included all children aged ≥5 and <8 years referred between October 2014 and June 2015 from PHCs and schools to the four eye clinics in VGR, with VA ≥0.65 in one or both eyes. At the eye clinic, children underwent assessment of VA, refraction in cycloplegia, eye motility, cover test, stereo test and a slit lamp examination.
RESULTS: Among the 259/295 children (139 female) participating, median age was 5.7 years (5.0-7.8 years) at referral. Glasses were prescribed due to subnormal VA with refractive errors in 20% of the children, 22% displayed heterophoria, none had heterotropia and one younger child had amblyopia. Accurate retesting gave fewer false-positive referrals.
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that a vision screening referral cut-off limit of VA <0.65 would leave undetected refractive errors. Residual amblyopia was uncommon. Accurate referral criteria, retesting and training of those performing the screening as well as re-evaluation of the screening programme are all important.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app