We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Prognostication of metastatic death in uveal melanoma patients: A Markov multi-state model.
Computers in Biology and Medicine 2018 November 2
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Uveal melanoma is fatal in almost 50% of patients. We previously developed a prognostic model to predict all-cause mortality. The aim of this study was to improve our model by predicting metastatic death as a cause-specific event distinct from other causes of death.
METHODS: Patients treated in Liverpool were included if they resided in England, Scotland or Wales and if their uveal melanoma involved the choroid. They were flagged at the National Health Service Cancer Registry, which automatically informed us of the date and cause of death of any deceased patients. A semiparametric Markov multi-state model was fitted. Two different baseline hazard rates were assumed, with state transition-specific covariates. For both failure types, age at treatment and sex were used. For the metastatic death case, these factors were added: anterior margin position, largest basal tumour diameter, tumour thickness, extra-ocular extension, presence of epithelioid melanoma cells, presence of closed connective tissue loops, increased mitotic count, chromosome 3 loss, and chromosome 8q gain. Missing data required a multiple-imputation procedure.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 4161 patients, 893 of whom died of metastastic disease with another 772 dying of other causes. The optimism-corrected, bootstrapped C-index for metastatic death prediction was 0.86, denoting very good discriminative performance. Bootstrapped calibration curves at two and five years also showed very good performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our improved model provides reliable, personalised metastatic death prognostication using clinical, histological and genetic information, and it can be used as a decision support tool to individualize patient care in a clinical environment.
METHODS: Patients treated in Liverpool were included if they resided in England, Scotland or Wales and if their uveal melanoma involved the choroid. They were flagged at the National Health Service Cancer Registry, which automatically informed us of the date and cause of death of any deceased patients. A semiparametric Markov multi-state model was fitted. Two different baseline hazard rates were assumed, with state transition-specific covariates. For both failure types, age at treatment and sex were used. For the metastatic death case, these factors were added: anterior margin position, largest basal tumour diameter, tumour thickness, extra-ocular extension, presence of epithelioid melanoma cells, presence of closed connective tissue loops, increased mitotic count, chromosome 3 loss, and chromosome 8q gain. Missing data required a multiple-imputation procedure.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 4161 patients, 893 of whom died of metastastic disease with another 772 dying of other causes. The optimism-corrected, bootstrapped C-index for metastatic death prediction was 0.86, denoting very good discriminative performance. Bootstrapped calibration curves at two and five years also showed very good performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our improved model provides reliable, personalised metastatic death prognostication using clinical, histological and genetic information, and it can be used as a decision support tool to individualize patient care in a clinical environment.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app