We have located links that may give you full text access.
Impact of an educational intervention on ankle-brachial index performance among medical students and fidelity assessment at month-6.
Annals of Vascular Surgery 2018 September 30
BACKGROUND: The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a clinical test to diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD). The Wyatt's score has been proposed to assess the students' performance on ABI measurement on a healthy volunteer (HV). No study has shown that this score is sensitive to different teaching methods. In this randomized-controlled-trial, we wanted to determine whether didactic learning alone or didactic learning combined with experiential learning improve proficiency in the ABI procedure assessed by the Wyatt's score.
METHODS: Medical students (n = 30) received a didactic learning, including i) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and ii) a video demonstration. Each student, was then randomized into two groups ("the no experiential learning group" and "the experiential learning group"). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and then the final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he performed a correct ABI procedure on a HV. The correct procedure corresponds to: i) correctly answered Wyatt's score and ii) a difference of an ABI measurement between a professor in vascular medicine and a student ≤0.15.
RESULTS: No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students for the Wyatt's score depending on their learning group (didactic alone (1/10) or didactic + experiential training (15/20)) and also for the ABI procedure (didactic alone (0/10) or didactic + experiential training (16/20)). At month-6, among the twelve students who passed the final evaluation, four passed both the Wyatt's score and the ABI measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the Wyatt's score was sensitive to an educational intervention and no improvement was found in the case of no experiential learning. The Wyatt's score could be used to evaluate student on ABI measurement after an educational intervention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in the vascular medicine department of Rennes University Hospital (France). This was approved by the ethics review board of our institution (n° 16.150).
METHODS: Medical students (n = 30) received a didactic learning, including i) a presentation of the ABI guidelines and ii) a video demonstration. Each student, was then randomized into two groups ("the no experiential learning group" and "the experiential learning group"). An initial evaluation was performed after the didactic learning and then the final evaluation at the end of the intervention. A student was considered to be proficient when he performed a correct ABI procedure on a HV. The correct procedure corresponds to: i) correctly answered Wyatt's score and ii) a difference of an ABI measurement between a professor in vascular medicine and a student ≤0.15.
RESULTS: No student was proficient at the initial evaluation. At the final evaluation, there was a significant difference between the number of proficient students for the Wyatt's score depending on their learning group (didactic alone (1/10) or didactic + experiential training (15/20)) and also for the ABI procedure (didactic alone (0/10) or didactic + experiential training (16/20)). At month-6, among the twelve students who passed the final evaluation, four passed both the Wyatt's score and the ABI measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the Wyatt's score was sensitive to an educational intervention and no improvement was found in the case of no experiential learning. The Wyatt's score could be used to evaluate student on ABI measurement after an educational intervention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in the vascular medicine department of Rennes University Hospital (France). This was approved by the ethics review board of our institution (n° 16.150).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app