We have located links that may give you full text access.
Age-Specific Associations of Ozone and PM 2.5 with Respiratory Emergency Department Visits in the US.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2018 October 3
RATIONALE: While associations between air pollution and respiratory morbidity for adults 65 and older are well-documented in the United States, the evidence for people under 65 is less extensive. To address this gap, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program collected respiratory emergency department (ED) data from 17 states.
OBJECTIVES: Estimate age-specific acute effects of ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on respiratory ED visits.
METHODS: We conducted time-series analyses in 894 counties by linking daily respiratory ED visits with estimated ozone and PM2.5 concentrations during the week before the date of the visit. Overall effect estimates were obtained using a Bayesian hierarchical model to combine county estimates for each pollutant by age group (children 0-18, adults 19-64, adults ≥65, and all ages) and by outcome group (acute respiratory infection, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and all respiratory ED visits).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rate ratios (95% credible interval) per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and all respiratory ED visits were 1.024 (1.018, 1.029) among children, 1.008 (1.004, 1.012) among adults <65, and 1.002 (0.996, 1.007) among adults 65 and older. Per 20 ppb increase in ozone, rate ratios were 1.017 (1.011, 1.023) among children, 1.051 (1.046, 1.056) among adults <65, and 1.033 (1.026, 1.040) among adults 65 and older. Associations varied in magnitude by age group for each outcome group.
CONCLUSIONS: These results address a gap in the evidence used to ensure adequate public health protection under national air pollution policies.
OBJECTIVES: Estimate age-specific acute effects of ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on respiratory ED visits.
METHODS: We conducted time-series analyses in 894 counties by linking daily respiratory ED visits with estimated ozone and PM2.5 concentrations during the week before the date of the visit. Overall effect estimates were obtained using a Bayesian hierarchical model to combine county estimates for each pollutant by age group (children 0-18, adults 19-64, adults ≥65, and all ages) and by outcome group (acute respiratory infection, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and all respiratory ED visits).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rate ratios (95% credible interval) per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and all respiratory ED visits were 1.024 (1.018, 1.029) among children, 1.008 (1.004, 1.012) among adults <65, and 1.002 (0.996, 1.007) among adults 65 and older. Per 20 ppb increase in ozone, rate ratios were 1.017 (1.011, 1.023) among children, 1.051 (1.046, 1.056) among adults <65, and 1.033 (1.026, 1.040) among adults 65 and older. Associations varied in magnitude by age group for each outcome group.
CONCLUSIONS: These results address a gap in the evidence used to ensure adequate public health protection under national air pollution policies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app