Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE LIMITS OF STABILITY TEST PERFORMED BY YOUNG ADULTS USING NEUROCOM® VSR SPORT.

Background: A reliable measure of dynamic postural control is needed for inclusion in the sports-related concussion assessment battery. Currently, there is not a clinical gold standard. The Limits of Stability (LOS) test has potential to be a useful tool to collect objective data on important dynamic postural stability variables. Psychometric properties of the LOS test with healthy young adults are yet to be established.

Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-session and test-retest reliability for the LOS on the NeuroCom® VSR Sport when performed by young adults.

Study Design: Reliability study.

Methods: Twenty-seven healthy university students completed four trials of the LOS in each of two testing sessions one week apart. Relative reliability was measured within each session with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[3, k ]) for Session 1 and Session 2, respectively, on each of the five dependent variables (movement velocity [MVL], directional control [DCL], maximum excursion [MXE], endpoint excursion [EPE], and reaction time [RT]) provided by the Neurocom. Test-retest reliability was assessed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance along with an ICC (3, k ) for relative reliability. An ICC value of 0.90 or higher was defined as having a high reliability, moderate reliability for ICC values between 0.80-0.89, and below 0.80 as questionable.

Results: The reliability within each session for LOS composite scores for MVL, DCL, and MXE was moderate to high (ICC[3, k ]=0.89-0.95). These same three variables also had high levels of test-retest reliability (ICC[3, k ]=0.95-0.96). EPE and RT had moderate reliability over time (ICC[3, k ]=0.88) but differences for within session reliability.

Conclusions: LOS provides a reliable measure of dynamic postural control for young adults. Two trials are recommended at baseline with the first being an adaptation trial to ensure accuracy of findings. Care needs to be taken when interpreting EPE and DCL scores on post-injury tests due to a learning effect for those variables.

Level of Evidence: 2c.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app