We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Role of Transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure in extremely low birth weight infants.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2019 January 2
BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is common in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. The objectives of this study were to describe our early clinical experience of transcatheter PDA closure (TCPC) in ELBW infants, compare outcomes with surgical ligation of PDA (SLP), and identify risk factors for prolonged respiratory support.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed comparing infants born <27 weeks, weighing <1 kg at birth and < 2 kg during TCPC with 2:1 propensity-score matched group of infants that underwent SLP. Change in respiratory severity scores (RSS) immediately post-procedure and the time taken for return to pre-procedure RSS for TCPC versus SLP was compared. Factors contributing to prolonged elevation of RSS were identified.
RESULTS: Eighty ELBW infants (median procedure weight: 1060 [range 640-2000] grams) that underwent successful TCPC were compared with 40 infants that underwent SLP (procedure weight 650-1760 g). There was greater increase in RSS following SLP compared to TCPC (76% vs. 18%; P < 0.01). It took longer for RSS to return to pre-procedural scores post-SLP compared to post-TCPC (28 vs. 8.4 hr; P < 0.01). Elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and TCPC at >8 weeks of age were associated with prolonged (>30-days) elevation of RSS ≥ 1 (OR = 5.4, 95%CI: 2.2-9.4, P < 0.01 and OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.5-4.2, P = 0.05 respectively). Overall complication rate for TCPC was 3.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: TCPC is feasible in infants as small as 640-2000 g and can be performed safely in the majority. TCPC may offer faster weaning of respiratory support compared to SLP when performed earlier in life, and before the onset of elevated PAP.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed comparing infants born <27 weeks, weighing <1 kg at birth and < 2 kg during TCPC with 2:1 propensity-score matched group of infants that underwent SLP. Change in respiratory severity scores (RSS) immediately post-procedure and the time taken for return to pre-procedure RSS for TCPC versus SLP was compared. Factors contributing to prolonged elevation of RSS were identified.
RESULTS: Eighty ELBW infants (median procedure weight: 1060 [range 640-2000] grams) that underwent successful TCPC were compared with 40 infants that underwent SLP (procedure weight 650-1760 g). There was greater increase in RSS following SLP compared to TCPC (76% vs. 18%; P < 0.01). It took longer for RSS to return to pre-procedural scores post-SLP compared to post-TCPC (28 vs. 8.4 hr; P < 0.01). Elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and TCPC at >8 weeks of age were associated with prolonged (>30-days) elevation of RSS ≥ 1 (OR = 5.4, 95%CI: 2.2-9.4, P < 0.01 and OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.5-4.2, P = 0.05 respectively). Overall complication rate for TCPC was 3.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: TCPC is feasible in infants as small as 640-2000 g and can be performed safely in the majority. TCPC may offer faster weaning of respiratory support compared to SLP when performed earlier in life, and before the onset of elevated PAP.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app