We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Should pre-manipulation radiographs be obtained in ankle fracture-dislocations?
Foot 2018 September
BACKGROUND: Should pre-manipulation radiographs be obtained in ankle fracture-dislocations? This question remains controversial. The twelfth British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST-12) published in August 2016 states that 'Reduction and splinting should be performed urgently for clinically deformed ankles. Radiographs should be obtained before reduction unless this will cause an unacceptable delay'.2 We quantify the delay caused by obtaining a pre-manipulation radiograph, and additionally determine whether a pre-manipulation radiograph influences the adequacy of initial reduction.
METHOD: Radiographs of consecutive adult ankle fractures that underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in a major trauma unit over a 12 months period were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups. Group A -- pre-manipulation but post radiograph frankly displaced ankle fractures not in a cast. Group B - post manipulation ankle fractures in a cast without prior radiograph, and group C -- minimally displaced ankle fractures not in a cast. Data was collected on age, gender, fracture pattern, time and mode of arrival to the ED. Further analysis was undertaken on groups A & B. Delay to, and adequacy of, reduction were recorded. Quality of surgical reduction and fixation was assessed. Cases of post-operative wound infection were identified and analysed. Mid-term patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) at a minimum of 21 months after surgery were recorded.
RESULTS: There were 62 patients in group A and 51 in group B. Obtaining a radiograph prior to manipulation resulted in a mean delay of 71 minutes from time of arrival to a radiograph being taken that confirmed a reduced ankle mortice. Taking a pre-manipulation radiograph did not increase the chances of a successful reduction at the first attempt. There was a trend towards better PROMS in patients who underwent early reduction in the ED.
CONCLUSION: The time taken to achieve a reduced ankle mortise was significantly longer for patients who had a radiograph before manipulation with the potential for exacerbating soft tissue trauma. A pre-plaster radiograph made no difference to the chances of a successful initial attempt at fracture manipulation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3: Retrospective Comparative Study.
METHOD: Radiographs of consecutive adult ankle fractures that underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in a major trauma unit over a 12 months period were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups. Group A -- pre-manipulation but post radiograph frankly displaced ankle fractures not in a cast. Group B - post manipulation ankle fractures in a cast without prior radiograph, and group C -- minimally displaced ankle fractures not in a cast. Data was collected on age, gender, fracture pattern, time and mode of arrival to the ED. Further analysis was undertaken on groups A & B. Delay to, and adequacy of, reduction were recorded. Quality of surgical reduction and fixation was assessed. Cases of post-operative wound infection were identified and analysed. Mid-term patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) at a minimum of 21 months after surgery were recorded.
RESULTS: There were 62 patients in group A and 51 in group B. Obtaining a radiograph prior to manipulation resulted in a mean delay of 71 minutes from time of arrival to a radiograph being taken that confirmed a reduced ankle mortice. Taking a pre-manipulation radiograph did not increase the chances of a successful reduction at the first attempt. There was a trend towards better PROMS in patients who underwent early reduction in the ED.
CONCLUSION: The time taken to achieve a reduced ankle mortise was significantly longer for patients who had a radiograph before manipulation with the potential for exacerbating soft tissue trauma. A pre-plaster radiograph made no difference to the chances of a successful initial attempt at fracture manipulation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3: Retrospective Comparative Study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app