We have located links that may give you full text access.
The effectiveness of alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction combined with maxillary protraction in the treatment of patients with a class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of Orthodontics 2018 December
OBJECTIVES: To establish the effectiveness of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction combined with Protraction Facial Mask (Alt-RAMEC/PFM) approach in treating Class III growing patients compared with PFM combined with conventional Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME/PFM). Search sources: Unrestricted search in five electronic databases and manual searching were undertaken up to February 2018.
DATA SELECTION: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of Alt-RAMEC/PFM were selected.
DATA EXTRACTION: Screening of references, data extraction and assessment of bias risk were evaluated independently by two reviewers.
RESULTS: Five RCTs comparing the Alt-RAMEC/PFM with RME/PFM met the inclusion criteria. Small but statistically significant mean differences favouring Alt-RAMEC/PFM protocol as measured by SNA angle (1.16°; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.66), SNB angle (0.67°; 95% CI 0.32 to 1.02) and ANB angle (0.66°; 95% CI 0.08 to 1.25) were noted. Alt-RAMEC/PFM exhibited a more favourable overjet correction when compared to RME/PFM, however, differences in other dental changes were insignificant.
CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence with high risk of bias that Alt-RAMEC/PFM can result in a statistically significant increase in maxillary protraction compared with RME/PFM in Chinese subjects over the short-term. High-quality long-term RCTs with inclusion of patient-reported outcomes are required.
DATA SELECTION: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of Alt-RAMEC/PFM were selected.
DATA EXTRACTION: Screening of references, data extraction and assessment of bias risk were evaluated independently by two reviewers.
RESULTS: Five RCTs comparing the Alt-RAMEC/PFM with RME/PFM met the inclusion criteria. Small but statistically significant mean differences favouring Alt-RAMEC/PFM protocol as measured by SNA angle (1.16°; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.66), SNB angle (0.67°; 95% CI 0.32 to 1.02) and ANB angle (0.66°; 95% CI 0.08 to 1.25) were noted. Alt-RAMEC/PFM exhibited a more favourable overjet correction when compared to RME/PFM, however, differences in other dental changes were insignificant.
CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence with high risk of bias that Alt-RAMEC/PFM can result in a statistically significant increase in maxillary protraction compared with RME/PFM in Chinese subjects over the short-term. High-quality long-term RCTs with inclusion of patient-reported outcomes are required.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app