Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of echocardiographic parameters in Fabry cardiomyopathy and light-chain cardiac amyloidosis.

Echocardiography 2018 September 25
BACKGROUND: Fabry cardiomyopathy (FC) and light-chain amyloid cardiomyopathy (AL) present with concentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy/remodeling and diastolic rather than systolic dysfunction. Direct comparisons are difficult due to rarity and confounded by variability of LV thickness.

AIMS: To compare LV diastolic and systolic properties between patients with FC and AL in a cohort matched for interventricular septal thickness (IVS).

METHODS: A two-center echocardiographic analysis was performed, comprising 118 patients with IVS ≥12 mm (FC and AL 59 patients each) matched by IVS.

RESULTS: Fabry cardiomyopathy patients had larger LV end-diastolic diameter (47.7 [44.0-50.9] vs 45.0 [41.5-49.0] mm, P = 0.002), better LV ejection fraction (EF 68.7 [63.4-74.0] vs 63.0 [54.0-70.0]%, P = 0.001) and midwall fractional shortening (midFS 14.8 [13.0-16.1] vs 12.1 [8.9-15.0]%, P = 0.006). LV EF <40% was rare in both (2% vs 7%, P = 0.17). AL patients expressed higher LV diastolic dysfunction grade (III in 26% vs 4%, II in 21% vs 12% and I in 54% vs 84%, P = 0.004), with higher E/e' ratio (13.6 [10.2-18.8] vs 9.8 [7.5-12.3], P < 0.0001). Average E/e' ratio and midFS were significantly associated with NYHA severity in both groups (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS: Matched AL patients had worse LV diastolic function than FC, driven by E/e'. Significant LV systolic dysfunction was rare overall. MidFS and E/e' were associated with heart failure severity in both groups.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app