We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
What Is the Best Electrophysiologic Marker of the Outcome of Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson Disease?
World Neurosurgery 2018 December
OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is advocated in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. Intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MER) and stimulation or imaging are applied to confirm electrode targeting. The study objective was to evaluate which intraoperative electrophysiologic marker, MER, stimulation, or local field potentials (LFP) was the most predictive of the clinical efficacy.
METHODS: Efficacy was determined with lateralized motor scores of Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in 36 patients (OFF-drug/ON-stimulation 1 year after surgery vs. OFF-drug before surgery). Trajectory lengths in STN were determined from MER. Stimulation was increased up to the thresholds of first decrease, of complete suppression of rigidity, and of excitation of pyramidal motor tract. β oscillations (11-31 Hz) were computed from LFP of the electrode macrocontact. Univariate and multivariate analyses were computed.
RESULTS: Motor improvements were linked to trajectory lengths in STN (R2 = 0.17; P > 0.005). No significant relationship was found for thresholds of first decrease or suppression in rigidity or for motor tract excitation (R2 < 0.03, P > 0.05). Motor improvements were most linked to β oscillation increases (R2 = 0.57, P < 0.005, linear regression; R2 = 0.84, P < 0.0001, post hoc sigmoid regression). β oscillations appeared more predictive than length (β: t = 5.4, P < 0.001; length: t = 2.70, P < 0.03). Improvements were also slightly predicted by preoperative scores (R2 = 0.13; P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Motor improvements emerged as most related to β oscillations, before trajectory length within the STN, whereas stimulation thresholds of rigidity or of motor tract excitation failed to show any relationship. The study encourages LFP measurement to confirm STN electrode location.
METHODS: Efficacy was determined with lateralized motor scores of Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in 36 patients (OFF-drug/ON-stimulation 1 year after surgery vs. OFF-drug before surgery). Trajectory lengths in STN were determined from MER. Stimulation was increased up to the thresholds of first decrease, of complete suppression of rigidity, and of excitation of pyramidal motor tract. β oscillations (11-31 Hz) were computed from LFP of the electrode macrocontact. Univariate and multivariate analyses were computed.
RESULTS: Motor improvements were linked to trajectory lengths in STN (R2 = 0.17; P > 0.005). No significant relationship was found for thresholds of first decrease or suppression in rigidity or for motor tract excitation (R2 < 0.03, P > 0.05). Motor improvements were most linked to β oscillation increases (R2 = 0.57, P < 0.005, linear regression; R2 = 0.84, P < 0.0001, post hoc sigmoid regression). β oscillations appeared more predictive than length (β: t = 5.4, P < 0.001; length: t = 2.70, P < 0.03). Improvements were also slightly predicted by preoperative scores (R2 = 0.13; P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Motor improvements emerged as most related to β oscillations, before trajectory length within the STN, whereas stimulation thresholds of rigidity or of motor tract excitation failed to show any relationship. The study encourages LFP measurement to confirm STN electrode location.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app