We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDY
Reevaluation of Current Prism Standards With Recommendations to Increase Accuracy in the Measurement of Strabismus.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2019 Februrary
PURPOSE: To critically evaluate the traditional standards for holding single prisms in measuring strabismus, with the specific goal being to increase the overall accuracy of clinical measurements.
DESIGN: Reliability and validity analysis.
METHODS: Using an analysis involving geometric optics, the effective prism power (EPP), measured in prism diopters (PD), was calculated for glass and acrylic prisms and was the main outcome measure. These results were also validated using optical bench measurements. No patients were involved.
RESULTS: Plotting the calculated effective prism power as a function of rotational angle produced curves demonstrating that the frontal plane position lies along the flatter portions of the curves, while the Prentice position lies along the steeper portions of the curves. Calculated values of prism power for the standard clinical positions as well as the percentage errors from accepted standards were compared. Acrylic prisms can be held in the frontal plane position with acceptable amounts of error (<5%) for prisms up to 50 PD. Glass prisms are capable of producing significant errors for measurements much greater than 10 PD.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of glass prisms as currently calibrated should be abandoned or at least limited to small measurements. Acrylic prisms produce acceptable errors if careful attention is given to their position.
DESIGN: Reliability and validity analysis.
METHODS: Using an analysis involving geometric optics, the effective prism power (EPP), measured in prism diopters (PD), was calculated for glass and acrylic prisms and was the main outcome measure. These results were also validated using optical bench measurements. No patients were involved.
RESULTS: Plotting the calculated effective prism power as a function of rotational angle produced curves demonstrating that the frontal plane position lies along the flatter portions of the curves, while the Prentice position lies along the steeper portions of the curves. Calculated values of prism power for the standard clinical positions as well as the percentage errors from accepted standards were compared. Acrylic prisms can be held in the frontal plane position with acceptable amounts of error (<5%) for prisms up to 50 PD. Glass prisms are capable of producing significant errors for measurements much greater than 10 PD.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of glass prisms as currently calibrated should be abandoned or at least limited to small measurements. Acrylic prisms produce acceptable errors if careful attention is given to their position.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app