Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of baseline professional attitudes and behaviors among student pharmacists to inform a co-curricular professional engagement program.

BACKGROUND: Professionalism in pharmacy students is an area of great focus with the release of Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016. This study assessed and compared student pharmacists' professionalism at one college of pharmacy to inform the implementation of a co-curricular professional engagement program.

METHODS: Two validated instruments (Behavioral Professionalism Assessment Instrument [BPAI] and Pharmacy Professionalism Instrument [PPI]) were administered to assess baseline professionalism. Kruskall-Wallis tests compared responses among the three pharmacy classes. Analysis was conducted using SPSS. This research was approved by the Mercer University's Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS: A total of 362 students completed the survey (75% response rate), of which 131 were first-year, 139 were second-year, and 92 were third-year students. There were significant differences in agreement among these classes of students as to whether a program focused on professional engagement was important and helpful (p < 0.001). Seven BPAI statements and five PPI statements demonstrated significant differences in the level of agreement among the professional years. These behaviors include: completing assignments independently and without supervision (p = 0.004); commitment to helping others (p = 0.004); reporting a medication error (p = 0.005); using time efficiently (p = 0.02); and being respectful (p = 0.04).

DISCUSSION: At baseline, 12 statements were significantly different in the level of agreement among the three pharmacy classes. Differences may be explained by perceived professionalism (in first-year students) versus actual professional behaviors (second- and third-year students), as well as breadth and depth of experience. A co-curricular professional engagement program could increase student awareness of professionalism and professional behaviors and be tailored to meet assessed student needs.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app