Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A mixed methods study of the management of hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children with Down syndrome.

Clinical Otolaryngology 2018 September 18
OBJECTIVES: To scope current service provision across England for management of otitis media with effusion and hearing loss in children with Down syndrome; to explore professional decision making about managing otitis media with effusion and hearing loss; to explore patient and public views on the direction of future research.

DESIGN: Mixed methods including a service evaluation of NHS clinical practice through a structured telephone survey; a qualitative study of professional decision making with in-depth interviews collected and analysed using grounded theory methods; patient/public involvement consultations.

PARTICIPANTS: 21 audiology services in England took part in the evaluation; 10 professionals participated in the qualitative study; 21 family members, 10 adults with Down syndrome and representatives from two charities contributed to the consultations.

RESULTS: There was variation across services in the frequency of routine hearing surveillance, approaches to managing conductive hearing loss in infancy and provision of hearing aids and grommets. There was variation in how professionals describe their decision making, reflecting individual treatment preferences, differing approaches to professional remit and institutional factors. The consultations identified that research should focus on improving practical support for managing the condition and supporting decision making about interventions.

CONCLUSIONS: There is system level variation in the provision of services, and individual level variation in how professionals make clinical decisions. As a consequence there is inequity of access to hearing healthcare for children with Down syndrome. Future research should focus on developing core outcomes for research and care, and on improving decision support for families. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app