We have located links that may give you full text access.
Differences in religiosity among cognitively intact, mildly cognitively impaired, and mildly demented elderly, and its possible relationship with depressive mood.
Applied Nursing Research : ANR 2018 October
INTRODUCTION: According to literature, religious attitudes can enhance cognitive functioning in elders, because it gives the sense of purpose in life. Therefore, due to the controversy among studies, it is of great importance to identify whether religiosity levels are greater in cognitively intact elders compared to participants with MCI as well as in patients with mild dementia irrespective etiology.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine possible differences with regards to religiosity levels between controls, MCI and patients with mild dementia.
METHODOLOGY: Religiosity was measured using the Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI-15R, Holland, et al., 1998), which was standardized in Greek population.
RESULTS: According to the ANOVA test, significant main effect was found for group by means of SBI-15R score F(2, 400) = 5.624, p = .004, η2 = .027. Post-hoc comparisons showed that MCI participants had significantly higher total religiosity scores (M = 35.48, SD = 9.67) compared to the healthy controls (M = 31.73, SD = 4.11), p = .002. Additionally, patients with mild dementia had also increased religiosity scores (M = 35.13, SD = 9.09) compared to controls (M = 31.73, SD = 4.11), p = .010. Additionally, Pearson correlation showed significant relationship between GDS with SBI-15R score (r = -.221 p = .023) and Religious beliefs & practices subscale (r = -.260 p = .007) in patients with mild dementia.
CONCLUSION: Results suggested that MCI participants as well as patients with mild dementia demonstrated higher religiosity levels compared to the healthy controls. Moreover, the total religiosity levels were related with depressive symptomatology only in patients with mild dementia unlike to the other two groups.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine possible differences with regards to religiosity levels between controls, MCI and patients with mild dementia.
METHODOLOGY: Religiosity was measured using the Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI-15R, Holland, et al., 1998), which was standardized in Greek population.
RESULTS: According to the ANOVA test, significant main effect was found for group by means of SBI-15R score F(2, 400) = 5.624, p = .004, η2 = .027. Post-hoc comparisons showed that MCI participants had significantly higher total religiosity scores (M = 35.48, SD = 9.67) compared to the healthy controls (M = 31.73, SD = 4.11), p = .002. Additionally, patients with mild dementia had also increased religiosity scores (M = 35.13, SD = 9.09) compared to controls (M = 31.73, SD = 4.11), p = .010. Additionally, Pearson correlation showed significant relationship between GDS with SBI-15R score (r = -.221 p = .023) and Religious beliefs & practices subscale (r = -.260 p = .007) in patients with mild dementia.
CONCLUSION: Results suggested that MCI participants as well as patients with mild dementia demonstrated higher religiosity levels compared to the healthy controls. Moreover, the total religiosity levels were related with depressive symptomatology only in patients with mild dementia unlike to the other two groups.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app