Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of Urine Choline Levels in Women With and Without Overactive Bladder Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether levels of choline (Ch) differ in women with and without overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.

METHODS: New patients were evaluated using the overactive bladder symptom score; Medical, Epidemiologic, and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) urgency incontinence questionnaire; and Impact Questionnaire 7 and provided a urine sample. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic controls, scoring 0 on overactive bladder symptom score and the MESA questionnaire, and patients with OAB and urgency incontinence (OAB-wet). Patients with conditions predisposing to OAB or had a history of OAB treatment were excluded. Choline detection was accomplished using a commercially available kit. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test were used to express differences between groups. Spearman ρ correlation was used to determine the relationship between Ch and questionnaire scores. Logistic regression was used to identify significant variables associated with OAB.

RESULTS: Sixty-three women were included in the final analysis. Patients with OAB-wet were older (P = 0.001), more likely to be obese (P = 0.04), had greater apical descent (P = 0.02), were more likely to be postmenopausal (P = 0.01), and were more likely to have stress incontinence (P = 0.005). Choline was 34.8% lower in OAB compared with the controls (P = 0.014). Lower Ch levels were associated with higher MESA (Spearman ρ = -0.311, P = 0.03). After logistic regression, lower Ch (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.98), age (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.18), and body mass index (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18) were significantly associated with OAB-wet.

CONCLUSIONS: Choline levels are significantly decreased in women complaining of OAB with urgency incontinence, and lower levels are associated with higher MESA scores.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app