We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Medical scribe in a trauma surgery outpatient clinic; shorter, cheaper consultations and satisfied doctors].
Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 2018 August 31
OBJECTIVE: To measure the effects of a medical scribe in an orthopaedic trauma surgery outpatient clinic on consultation time, patient satisfaction, doctor satisfaction and costs.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHOD: At a level-1 trauma centre in the Netherlands, all standard outpatient trauma consultations were performed either with or without a medical scribe, for a period of 10 weeks. Length of consultation time was defined as the time from commencement of the consultation until the moment the electronic health record had been completely filled out and checked by the surgeon. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a validated questionnaire (PSQ-NL-18). Doctor satisfaction was assessed through a non-structured interview when the study ended in which doctors voiced their opinion on the cooperation with the medical scribe and the feasibility of employing medical scribes. Staffing costs of consultations were calculated by multiplying the gross salaries of surgeons and scribes (in €/min) and the consultation time (in minutes).
RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were seen with the scribe, and 304 without the scribe. The mean consultation time was 3.2 minutes shorter in the study group compared with the control group (95% CI: 2.2-4.2). Patient satisfaction did not differ between the groups (mean PSQ-NL-18 total score: 4.4 (SD: 0.5) in the group with scribe and 4.3 (SD: 0.5) in the group without scribe (p = 0.45). The physicians felt they had more patient interaction and found working with the medical scribe satisfying. Mean staffing costs with the medical scribe (€19.35 per consultation, SD 10.4) were significantly lower than without (€21.82 per consultation, SD 11.3; p = 0.03). Annually, a cost reduction of €10,500 could be achieved in this outpatient clinic by the introduction of a medical scribe.
CONCLUSION: The use of a medical scribe for the documentation during a consultation in an outpatient clinic with a high patient turnover seems to increase doctor productivity and doctor satisfaction.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHOD: At a level-1 trauma centre in the Netherlands, all standard outpatient trauma consultations were performed either with or without a medical scribe, for a period of 10 weeks. Length of consultation time was defined as the time from commencement of the consultation until the moment the electronic health record had been completely filled out and checked by the surgeon. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a validated questionnaire (PSQ-NL-18). Doctor satisfaction was assessed through a non-structured interview when the study ended in which doctors voiced their opinion on the cooperation with the medical scribe and the feasibility of employing medical scribes. Staffing costs of consultations were calculated by multiplying the gross salaries of surgeons and scribes (in €/min) and the consultation time (in minutes).
RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were seen with the scribe, and 304 without the scribe. The mean consultation time was 3.2 minutes shorter in the study group compared with the control group (95% CI: 2.2-4.2). Patient satisfaction did not differ between the groups (mean PSQ-NL-18 total score: 4.4 (SD: 0.5) in the group with scribe and 4.3 (SD: 0.5) in the group without scribe (p = 0.45). The physicians felt they had more patient interaction and found working with the medical scribe satisfying. Mean staffing costs with the medical scribe (€19.35 per consultation, SD 10.4) were significantly lower than without (€21.82 per consultation, SD 11.3; p = 0.03). Annually, a cost reduction of €10,500 could be achieved in this outpatient clinic by the introduction of a medical scribe.
CONCLUSION: The use of a medical scribe for the documentation during a consultation in an outpatient clinic with a high patient turnover seems to increase doctor productivity and doctor satisfaction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app