We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Single-Screw Fixation Compared With Double Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolar Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2018 November
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether single or double screw (DS) fixation of medial malleolar fractures results in better long-term health outcomes.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial; sealed envelope technique.
SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Hospital at University of Calgary, Canada.
PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients were randomized to receive either 1 or 2 screws to reduce a medial malleolar fracture. Thirteen patients were excluded because of loss to follow-up (n = 127).
INTERVENTION: Surgical fixation of the medial malleolar fracture was performed using 1 or 2 stainless steel screws.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was comparison of physical functioning summary score on Short Form 36 questionnaires between patients in the 2 groups. Secondary objectives were to compare the Ankle Hindfoot Scale and operating room time. Clinical and radiographic assessment occurred at the time of injury and 2, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients crossed over from the DS group to the single screw (SS) group based on intraoperative decisions by the surgeon (fragment too small for 2 screws), leaving the SS (n = 75) and DS groups (n = 52). There was no difference in the operating room time, SF36, or Ankle Hindfoot Scale at all follow-up time points.
CONCLUSIONS: SS medial malleolar fixation provides an equally safe and effective method of fracture care as compared to DS fixation. Twenty percent of patients receiving 2 screws can be expected to crossover to receive SS fixation as a safer alternative.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial; sealed envelope technique.
SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Hospital at University of Calgary, Canada.
PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients were randomized to receive either 1 or 2 screws to reduce a medial malleolar fracture. Thirteen patients were excluded because of loss to follow-up (n = 127).
INTERVENTION: Surgical fixation of the medial malleolar fracture was performed using 1 or 2 stainless steel screws.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was comparison of physical functioning summary score on Short Form 36 questionnaires between patients in the 2 groups. Secondary objectives were to compare the Ankle Hindfoot Scale and operating room time. Clinical and radiographic assessment occurred at the time of injury and 2, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients crossed over from the DS group to the single screw (SS) group based on intraoperative decisions by the surgeon (fragment too small for 2 screws), leaving the SS (n = 75) and DS groups (n = 52). There was no difference in the operating room time, SF36, or Ankle Hindfoot Scale at all follow-up time points.
CONCLUSIONS: SS medial malleolar fixation provides an equally safe and effective method of fracture care as compared to DS fixation. Twenty percent of patients receiving 2 screws can be expected to crossover to receive SS fixation as a safer alternative.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app