We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
A clinical observation evaluation of bioactive soluble beta-glucan gel compared with standard care.
Journal of Wound Care 2018 September 3
OBJECTIVE: Clinicians across all health-care settings are challenged daily by wounds that are slow or static in healing due to time constraints, reduced resources and the negative impact upon the patient's quality of life (QoL). Community settings are particularly challenging due to the varied environments, patient social, psychological and financial constraints, and multi-clinician wound care monitoring. The aim of this clinical evaluation is to clinically evaluate bioactive soluble beta-glucan gel (BSBG) on those wounds that have stalled at four weeks as an adjunct to normal standards of care.
METHOD: A clinical observational evaluation was undertaken within a large community setting, reviewing patients who self-presented with stalled healing/chronic wounds, and the effects upon adding a BSBG gel twice a week for eight weeks as part of their set standard care. Formulary cleansing and dressing products were continued and results monitored by a designated clinician. All data was collected as part of the patient's normal wound review routine in relation to primary outcome of wound reduction with secondary outcomes relating to pain reduction, slough and necrosis reduction, exudate reduction and adverse events.
RESULTS: At six months, analysis of data demonstrated >2-times a higher rate of healing in chronic wounds with eight weeks' initial treatment and >4-times a higher rate of healing over six months in those patients with ulceration (PU, VLU, DFU). A reduction of per patient care cost saving was achieved across the treatment group compared with the standard care retrospective group.
CONCLUSION: The administration of a wound healing gel within a moderate size cohort of patients presenting with chronic wounds resulted in improved wound reduction and significant cost savings.
METHOD: A clinical observational evaluation was undertaken within a large community setting, reviewing patients who self-presented with stalled healing/chronic wounds, and the effects upon adding a BSBG gel twice a week for eight weeks as part of their set standard care. Formulary cleansing and dressing products were continued and results monitored by a designated clinician. All data was collected as part of the patient's normal wound review routine in relation to primary outcome of wound reduction with secondary outcomes relating to pain reduction, slough and necrosis reduction, exudate reduction and adverse events.
RESULTS: At six months, analysis of data demonstrated >2-times a higher rate of healing in chronic wounds with eight weeks' initial treatment and >4-times a higher rate of healing over six months in those patients with ulceration (PU, VLU, DFU). A reduction of per patient care cost saving was achieved across the treatment group compared with the standard care retrospective group.
CONCLUSION: The administration of a wound healing gel within a moderate size cohort of patients presenting with chronic wounds resulted in improved wound reduction and significant cost savings.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app