We have located links that may give you full text access.
Ceramic soft tissue trimming bur: A new tool for gingival depigmentation.
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 2019 January
Objective: Pigmentation of the gingiva plays a negative role in an otherwise acceptable "smile window". In the present world, people are more concerned about their aesthetics. Several techniques have been employed such as scalpel surgery, electrosurgery, cryosurgery, chemical agents, abrasion and LASER method for the removal of melanin hyper-pigmentation. The present study is aimed at comparing the efficacy of LASER and soft tissue trimmer for gingival depigmentation.
Methods: A randomized split-mouth study was conducted for twenty patients with gingival pigmentation. Dummet Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI), Gingival Pigmentation Index (GPI) for pigmentation, bleeding factor, wound healing factor, gingival colour and visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain were evaluated for both the groups at baseline, 7th day, 1st month and 6th month.
Results: Intra-group comparison between baseline and 6th month showed highly significant difference for both LASER and bur groups. There was no statistically significant difference found between both the groups at 6th month using gingival pigmentation index.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that LASER and soft tissue trimmer both are comparable in achieving aesthetic satisfaction. Hence, the soft tissue trimmer could also be used for depigmentation as it is very cost effective, readily available and acceptable by the patients.
Methods: A randomized split-mouth study was conducted for twenty patients with gingival pigmentation. Dummet Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI), Gingival Pigmentation Index (GPI) for pigmentation, bleeding factor, wound healing factor, gingival colour and visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain were evaluated for both the groups at baseline, 7th day, 1st month and 6th month.
Results: Intra-group comparison between baseline and 6th month showed highly significant difference for both LASER and bur groups. There was no statistically significant difference found between both the groups at 6th month using gingival pigmentation index.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that LASER and soft tissue trimmer both are comparable in achieving aesthetic satisfaction. Hence, the soft tissue trimmer could also be used for depigmentation as it is very cost effective, readily available and acceptable by the patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app