Early secondary repair of labial tears, 1st and 2nd degree perineal lacerations and mediolateral episiotomies in a midwifery-led clinic. A retrospective evaluation of cases based on photo documentation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether early secondary repair of labial tears, 1st and 2nd degree perineal lacerations and episiotomies provided an anatomically acceptable result.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 126 women undergoing an early secondary repair of birth lacerations not involving the sphincter complex within 21 days postpartum. Patients were included from 1 January 2014 to 11 August 2017 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Photo documentation of the wound was available just before the early secondary repair and at the follow-up visit after the repair. Photos were evaluated by two trained Urogynaecological Consultants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the anatomic result of the early secondary repair was acceptable based on photo documentation.

RESULTS: Early secondary repair was performed by a specialised team of midwives in 94.4% and by doctors in 5.6% of the cases. In all, 72.2% were 2nd degree perineal lacerations. The most common indications for early secondary repair were wound dehiscence (55.3%) and suboptimal primary repair (34.1%). At the follow-up clinical examination seven days after the early secondary repair, the result was considered anatomically acceptable in 67.5% of the cases, not optimal in 22.2% and not possible to evaluate in 10.3% of the cases. In 7.9% of the cases, wound infection was suspected after the early secondary repair.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on photo documentation, early secondary repair of birth lacerations not involving the sphincter complex provides an anatomically acceptable result in the majority of cases without risk of serious complications.