We have located links that may give you full text access.
Antiosteoporotic Drugs to Promote Bone Regeneration Related to Titanium Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews 2018 October 27
This meta-analysis was to systematically investigate all preclinical researches on the possible benefits of antiosteoporotic drugs on titanium implants. Also, we performed a subgroup analysis to examine if the methods of drug delivery (systemic vs. local vs. surface coatings) or the types of antiosteoporotic drug (anticatabolic vs. anabolic) have more effect on bone-to-implant regeneration. A total of 116 articles (animal studies) were included. Poor reporting was assessed in the majority of the included studies. Then, results of meta-analysis showed that the use of osteoporotic medications significantly increased the overall values of micro-CT bone volume (BV) (mean differences [MD]: 21.7%, confidence interval [CI]: 17.8-25.7), bone-to-implant contact (BIC) (MD: 12.1%, CI: 10.6-13.7), torque-out (MD: 5.7N.cm, CI: 4.6-6.8), and push-out (MD: 67.3N, CI: 54.6-79.9) compared with the values of implants without osteoporotic medications. Also, implants coated with drugs showed higher values of BIC (MD: 16.8%, CI: 12.4-21.3) compared with implants received drugs through systemic administration (MD: 12.2%, CI: 10.1-14.3) or local administration (MD: 8.6%, CI: 5.8-11.4). A positive effect of local delivery of antiosteoporotic drugs was significant on push-out testing (MD: 169.8N, CI: 120.1-219.6) compared with the use of drugs through systemic route (MD: 51.6N, CI: 38.7-64.6) or as surface coatings (MD: 24.1N, CI: 15.4-32.7). Finally, anabolic drugs showed a significant effect on push-out forces (MD: 125.5N, CI: 95.5-155.5) compared with the use of anticatabolic drugs (MD: 51.9N, CI: 39.5-64.5). In conclusion, the positive effect of antiosteoporotic drugs on osseointegration is observed in the present meta-analysis. Mainly, antiosteoporotic drug-coated implant surfaces showed an increase of BIC% compared with implants received drugs through local routes, but not with systemic routes. Also, the positive effect of anabolic drugs seems beyond the effect of anticatabolic drugs in terms of mechanical stability of implants as tested by push-out.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app