Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Relationships between histogram analysis of ADC values and complex 18F-FDG-PET parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Histogram analysis is an emergent imaging technique to further analyze radiological images and to obtain imaging biomarker. In head and neck cancer, MRI and PET are routinely used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to analyze associations between histogram based ADC parameters and complex FDG-PET derived parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS: 34 patients (26% female, mean age, 56.7 ± 10.2 years) with primary HNSCC were prospectively included into the study. ADC histogram parameters were calculated by inhouse made matlab software using a whole lesion measurement. For each tumor, maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean), Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) and Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) were determined on PET-images. Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to analyze associations between investigated parameters. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to adjust for multiple testing. Mann-Whitney test was used for group discrimination. P-values < 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS: The correlation analysis in the whole tumor group revealed a statistically significant correlation between entropy and MTV as well as TLG (ρ = 0.67, P<0.0001 and ρ = 0.61, P = 0.0002 respectively). There were statistically significant differences between T1/2 and T3/4 tumors in the following parameters: entropy (2.07 ± 0.36 vs 2.61 ± 0.43, P = 0.007), SUVmax (10.79 ± 4.13 vs 17.93 ± 5.89, P = 0.007), SUVmean (6.39 ± 2.48 vs 9.81 ± 4.49, P = 0.01), SUVmin (4.09 ± 1.57 vs 6.34 ± 2.59, P = 0.03), MTV (9.50 ± 7.92 vs 20.36 ± 13.30, P = 0.02), TGU (55.97 ± 39.09 vs 212.3 ± 186.3, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION: This study showed that entropy derived from ADC maps is strongly associated with MTV and TLG in HNSCC. Entropy, SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG and MTV were statistically significant higher in T3/4 tumors in comparison to T1/2 carcinomas.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app