We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of extreme patient-reported outcome in early spondyloarthritis and its impact on the effect of TNF-α blockers treatment.
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2018 November
OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of extreme patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in an early axial spondyloarthritis setting, to compare the phenotype of patients with/without extreme PRO and to evaluate the impact of extreme PRO on the effectiveness of TNF-α blockers (TNFb).
METHODS: This analysis was performed in the DESIR cohort. Extreme PRO were measured at baseline and were defined as a score ≥8 on at least three of first five BASDAI items. Phenotype of patient's with/without extreme PRO was compared. Impact of extreme PRO on TNFb effectiveness was evaluated by comparing the retention rate of the first TNFb in both groups by survival curves analysis (log-rank and Cox analysis).
RESULTS: Extreme PRO were present in 95 out of the 708 patients (13.4%). Patients with extreme PRO were older (mean (SD) age of 35.4(8.6) years vs. 33.5(8.7) years), more frequently females (65.3% vs. 51.9%), had higher BASDAI (7.1 vs. 4.1), reported more frequently history of depression (25.3% vs. 10.2%) and use of anti-depressive drugs (19.0% vs. 7.2%). TNFb treatment was more frequently initiated in the extreme PRO group (48.4% vs. 25.5%), while the proportion of patients still on TNFb at 2 years was significantly lower in the extreme PRO group 18.6% (n=8) vs. 39.5% (n=60). Presence of extreme PRO was independently associated with first TNFb discontinuation (HR 1.8, [95% CI 1.2;2.9], p=0.01)).
CONCLUSIONS: Although presence of extreme PRO in this early axSpA setting was not very frequent, patients with extreme PRO were more likely to receive a TNFb and less likely to maintain the treatment at 2 years. Further studies evaluating the specific impact of extreme PRO on TNFb treatment in axSpA are warranted.
METHODS: This analysis was performed in the DESIR cohort. Extreme PRO were measured at baseline and were defined as a score ≥8 on at least three of first five BASDAI items. Phenotype of patient's with/without extreme PRO was compared. Impact of extreme PRO on TNFb effectiveness was evaluated by comparing the retention rate of the first TNFb in both groups by survival curves analysis (log-rank and Cox analysis).
RESULTS: Extreme PRO were present in 95 out of the 708 patients (13.4%). Patients with extreme PRO were older (mean (SD) age of 35.4(8.6) years vs. 33.5(8.7) years), more frequently females (65.3% vs. 51.9%), had higher BASDAI (7.1 vs. 4.1), reported more frequently history of depression (25.3% vs. 10.2%) and use of anti-depressive drugs (19.0% vs. 7.2%). TNFb treatment was more frequently initiated in the extreme PRO group (48.4% vs. 25.5%), while the proportion of patients still on TNFb at 2 years was significantly lower in the extreme PRO group 18.6% (n=8) vs. 39.5% (n=60). Presence of extreme PRO was independently associated with first TNFb discontinuation (HR 1.8, [95% CI 1.2;2.9], p=0.01)).
CONCLUSIONS: Although presence of extreme PRO in this early axSpA setting was not very frequent, patients with extreme PRO were more likely to receive a TNFb and less likely to maintain the treatment at 2 years. Further studies evaluating the specific impact of extreme PRO on TNFb treatment in axSpA are warranted.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app