Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison between the Staphylococci aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci infected total joint arthroplasty treated by two-stage revision: A retrospective study with two year minimum follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus species are major pathogens of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Coagulase-positive staphylococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci have different intrinsic virulences. However, few studies have specifically compared the clinical manifestations and two-stage revision outcomes of PJI caused by these two species.

METHODS: We retrospectively collected 260 arthroplasty patients who underwent a two-stage revision because of PJI from January 2003 to June 2015 in our institute because of PJI. Sixty-four patients (36 hips and 28 knees) and 23 patients (13 hips and 10 knees) were infected by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and SA, respectively.

RESULTS: The preoperative mean ESR value of the SA group was higher than that of the CoNS group (median, 60.9 VS 35.9; P < 0.001). Seventeen (73.9%) of the 23 SA infected patients had a sinus tract, while only 12 (18.8%) of the 64 CoNS-infected patients had this symptom (73.9% VS 18.8%; P < 0.001). At the time of follow-up, 58 (90.6%) of the 64 CoNS-infected patients had successfully controlled the infection. In the SA group, 20 (87.0%) patients ultimately acquired successful control (90.6% VS 87.0%; P = 0.923). Surgical history was identified as a potential risk factor (OR = 6.2, 95%CI 1.17-32.4) for prognosis when potential covariates were adjusted.

CONCLUSIONS: SA infection has a higher ESR value and a more frequent occurrence of sinus tract. The infection control rate of the two-stage revision protocol was close to 90% for both SA and CoNS species, and there is no statistically significant difference in the eradication rate of infection between the SA and CoNS groups. Surgical history may be a good predictor of failure for PJI patients treated with two-stage revision.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app