We have located links that may give you full text access.
Normative posterior pole asymmetry analysis data in healthy Caucasian population.
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2018 September 5
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the variability of central retinal thickness asymmetry in healthy Caucasian adults with the posterior pole asymmetry analysis to serve as a reference.
METHODS: In total, 404 eyes of 202 subjects who aged between 18 and 80 years, who had no ocular pathology, were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Retinal thickness maps with posterior pole asymmetry analysis mode were taken with the optical coherence tomography (SPECTRALIS SD-OCT; Heidelberg Engineering). Superior and inferior hemifields were divided into five zones resembling to the strategy in Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Mean retinal thickness in each of the five zones was compared with the thickness of the corresponding zone in each eye (paired-samples t-test), and differences in retinal thickness (DRT1-5) and ganglion cell layer thickness between reciprocal locations were measured. Differences in retinal thickness values of two eyes of each subject were also compared (independent-samples t-test).
RESULTS: The intra-eye asymmetry was statistically significant in zones 4 and 5. The highest mean intraocular differences in retinal thickness were 5.8 µm (zone 5) in all eyes, 5.8 µm (zone 5) in the right eyes, and 5.9 µm (zones 4 and 5) in the left eyes. The only statistically significant interocular local differences in retinal thickness asymmetries were found in zone 3. The intraocular asymmetry in retinal thickness was found to be the lowest in zone 1. The differences of ganglion cell layer thickness (GCLTs) were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: There were statistically significant physiological inter-eye asymmetry in zone 3 and intra-eye asymmetries in zones 4 and 5. These measurements must be considered during screening for glaucoma with posterior pole asymmetry analysis in the Caucasian population.
METHODS: In total, 404 eyes of 202 subjects who aged between 18 and 80 years, who had no ocular pathology, were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Retinal thickness maps with posterior pole asymmetry analysis mode were taken with the optical coherence tomography (SPECTRALIS SD-OCT; Heidelberg Engineering). Superior and inferior hemifields were divided into five zones resembling to the strategy in Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Mean retinal thickness in each of the five zones was compared with the thickness of the corresponding zone in each eye (paired-samples t-test), and differences in retinal thickness (DRT1-5) and ganglion cell layer thickness between reciprocal locations were measured. Differences in retinal thickness values of two eyes of each subject were also compared (independent-samples t-test).
RESULTS: The intra-eye asymmetry was statistically significant in zones 4 and 5. The highest mean intraocular differences in retinal thickness were 5.8 µm (zone 5) in all eyes, 5.8 µm (zone 5) in the right eyes, and 5.9 µm (zones 4 and 5) in the left eyes. The only statistically significant interocular local differences in retinal thickness asymmetries were found in zone 3. The intraocular asymmetry in retinal thickness was found to be the lowest in zone 1. The differences of ganglion cell layer thickness (GCLTs) were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: There were statistically significant physiological inter-eye asymmetry in zone 3 and intra-eye asymmetries in zones 4 and 5. These measurements must be considered during screening for glaucoma with posterior pole asymmetry analysis in the Caucasian population.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app