Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Psychometric approach of the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for Oral Health (IPQ-R-OH) in patients with periodontal disease.

Journal of Periodontology 2018 September 4
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the validated Spanish version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised for Oral Health (IPQ-R-OH) in patients with periodontal disease.

METHODS: We used the IPQ-R for Oral Health (IPQ-R-OH), a self-reported 36-item scale with. This study was carried out using data from 517 patients with periodontal disease attending the dental clinic at the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Pasto, Colombia. A three parameter logistic model (3PL) for polytomous response was calculated to evaluate a model of individuals' responses. The McDonald's Omega (Ω ≥ 0.60) coefficient and composite reliability were used to determine the internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the fit of the hypothesized seven-factor model, and the configural invariance was tested to estimate the structure in each sex group.

RESULTS: The slope, location and guessing parameters determined reasonable accurate items according to item response theory analysis. The internal consistency coefficients of each factor ranged from 0.62-0.93 (McDonald's Omega) and 0.66-0.87 (composite reliability). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a seven-factor model (χ2 S-B  = 2572.165; χ2 S-B /(573) = 4.489, p < 0.01; NNFI = 0.950; CFI = 0.950; RMSEA = 0.055 (90% CI [0.052 - 0.059]); SRMR = 0.080 and AIC = 1426.165. The seven-factors loaded similarly to the original IPQ-R scale. Multigroup CFA analysis results supported factor invariance across the sex groups.

CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the IPQ-R-OH has adequate reliability and construct factorial validity; therefore, it could be a valuable instrument in screening illness perceptions in patients with periodontal disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app