Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of Quantitative Multiple Breath Specific Ventilation Imaging Using Co-localized 2D Oxygen Enhanced MRI and Hyperpolarized 3 He MRI.

Two magnetic resonance specific ventilation imaging (SVI) techniques namely, oxygen enhanced proton (OE-1H) and hyperpolarized 3 He (HP-3He) were compared in eight healthy supine subjects (age 32(6) yr). An in-house radio-frequency coil array for 1 H configured with the 3 He transmit-receive coil in-situ enabled acquisition of SVI data from two nuclei from the same slice without repositioning the subjects. Following 3×3 voxel-down-sampling to account for spatial registration errors between the two SV images, the voxel-by-voxel correlation coefficient of two SV maps ranged from 0.11 to 0.63 (0.46 mean (0.17 SD), (p < 0.05). Several indices were analysed and compared from the tidal volume matched SV maps; the mean of SV log-normal distribution (SVmean), standard deviation of the distribution as a measure of SV heterogeneity (SVwidth) and the gravitational gradient (SVslope). There were no significant differences in SVmean: OE-1H: 0.28(0.08) and HP-3He: 0.32(0.14), SVwidths: OE-1H: 0.28(0.08) and HP-3He: 0.27(0.10) and SVslopes: OE-1H: -0.016(0.006) cm-1 and HP-3He: -0.013(0.007) cm-1 . Despite the statistical similarities of the population averages, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated large individual inter-technique variability. Standard deviations of differences in these indices were SVmean: 42%, SVwidths: 46%, and SVslopes: 62% of their corresponding overall mean values. The present study showed that two independent, spatially co-registered, SVI techniques presented a moderate positive voxel-by-voxel correlation. Population averages of SVmean, SVwidth and SVslope were in close agreement. However, the lack of agreement when the data sets were analysed individually might indicate some fundamental mechanistic differences between the techniques.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app