We have located links that may give you full text access.
Platelet-lymphocyte Ratio After Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Administration: an Early Prognostic Marker in Septic Shock Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia.
Shock 2019 August
INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) causes life-threatening complications, but little is known in septic shock patients with FN. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein level, immature granulocyte count, white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), in septic shock patients with FN at admission and after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration.
METHODS: Data on consecutive adult septic shock patients with FN treated with G-CSF between June 2012 and June 2017 were extracted from a prospectively compiled septic shock registry. Clinical and serial laboratory data at admission and <24 h after G-CSF administration were compared between nonsurvivor and 1-month survivor groups.
RESULTS: Of 1,671 septic shock patients, 158 FN patients were treated with G-CSF and 114 (72.2%) survived for 1 month. At admission, no clinical and serial laboratory data were significant to predict survival. After G-CSF administration, PLR and APACHE II were independent predictors for 1-month survival. PLR after administration of G-CSF >100 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 9.394; 95% CI, 2.821-31.285, P < 0.001) showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.4%, 46.2%, 82.9%, and 60.0%, respectively, and APACHE II <28 (aOR, 6.944; 95% CI, 2.351-20.511, P < 0.001) showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 86.8%, 63.6%, 86.1%, and 65.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After G-CSF administration in septic shock patients with chemotherapy-induced FN, PLR may be used as an early prognostic marker for mortality.
METHODS: Data on consecutive adult septic shock patients with FN treated with G-CSF between June 2012 and June 2017 were extracted from a prospectively compiled septic shock registry. Clinical and serial laboratory data at admission and <24 h after G-CSF administration were compared between nonsurvivor and 1-month survivor groups.
RESULTS: Of 1,671 septic shock patients, 158 FN patients were treated with G-CSF and 114 (72.2%) survived for 1 month. At admission, no clinical and serial laboratory data were significant to predict survival. After G-CSF administration, PLR and APACHE II were independent predictors for 1-month survival. PLR after administration of G-CSF >100 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 9.394; 95% CI, 2.821-31.285, P < 0.001) showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.4%, 46.2%, 82.9%, and 60.0%, respectively, and APACHE II <28 (aOR, 6.944; 95% CI, 2.351-20.511, P < 0.001) showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 86.8%, 63.6%, 86.1%, and 65.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After G-CSF administration in septic shock patients with chemotherapy-induced FN, PLR may be used as an early prognostic marker for mortality.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app