We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Men With and Without Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study.
Journal of Physical Activity & Health 2018 October 2
BACKGROUND: Men with prostate cancer (PCa) may be referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following a significant cardiac event, but it is unknown if these men have different effects of CR from men without a history of PCa.
PURPOSE: To compare the effect of CR on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak), body fat percentage, and body mass index in men with and without a history of PCa.
METHODS: CR participants with PCa were retrospectively compared with a cohort matched on age, clinical indication for CR, and date of referral to the CR program. Participants completed the standardized CR program at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, including 1 weekly supervised group session and 4 additional weekly home sessions including aerobic and resistance training for 26 weeks.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (n = 27) men with PCa were identified and matched 1∶1 with controls. VO2 peak increased in the PCa group (16.9 [5.1]-19.6 [6.2] mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ; Δ 2.7 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , P < .05) and in the control group (16.4 [4.2]-20.2 [5.8] mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ; Δ 3.8 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , P < .05) as a result of engaging in CR. There were no significant between-group differences in the postintervention outcomes (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Men with and without PCa experience comparable benefits following CR completion.
PURPOSE: To compare the effect of CR on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak), body fat percentage, and body mass index in men with and without a history of PCa.
METHODS: CR participants with PCa were retrospectively compared with a cohort matched on age, clinical indication for CR, and date of referral to the CR program. Participants completed the standardized CR program at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, including 1 weekly supervised group session and 4 additional weekly home sessions including aerobic and resistance training for 26 weeks.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (n = 27) men with PCa were identified and matched 1∶1 with controls. VO2 peak increased in the PCa group (16.9 [5.1]-19.6 [6.2] mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ; Δ 2.7 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , P < .05) and in the control group (16.4 [4.2]-20.2 [5.8] mL·kg-1 ·min-1 ; Δ 3.8 mL·kg-1 ·min-1 , P < .05) as a result of engaging in CR. There were no significant between-group differences in the postintervention outcomes (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Men with and without PCa experience comparable benefits following CR completion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app