Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 2D Versus 3D Laparoscopy in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri (≥ 500g).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy using 3D vision in comparison with 2D vision in women with large uteri (≥500g).

DESIGN: Retrospective analytical study Design Classification: Canadian Task Force II-1 Setting: Tertiary referral center for advanced gynecological surgery.

PATIENTS: Five hundred forty six women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy over a period of 13 years were studied: 301 under 2D vision and 245 under 3D vision.

INTERVENTIONS: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy Measurements: Surgical time, blood loss and complications were recorded for every case in both groups.

MAIN RESULTS: The duration of surgery for hysterectomy in the 3D laparoscopy group (88.01?36.95 min) was significantly shorter than that in the 2D group (112.61?42.59 min, p=.0001). Blood loss in the 500-1000g group was significantly less in the 3D group (p=.005). The total complication rates for 3D surgery (3.37 %) and 2D surgery (6.64%) were comparable (p=.25).

CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional laparoscopy provides stereoscopic vision and increases precision and safety. The availability of depth perception adds to the ease of surgery, especially in cases of large uteri, leading to reductions in both the duration of surgery and blood loss, which improves patient outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app