Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Long-term comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term postoperative refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification, both with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea.

DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.

METHODS: Postoperative refractive outcomes were compared between patients with cataract and coexisting primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) who had phacotrabeculectomy (combined group) and patients with cataract with or without coexisting OAG who had phacoemulsification alone (phaco-only group). The refractive prediction error, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were compared between groups. Subgroup analysis based on preoperative axial length (AL) was performed (medium >22.0 to <24.5 mm; medium-long ≥24.5 to <26.0 mm; long ≥26.0 mm).

RESULTS: The combined group comprised 51 eyes and the phaco-only group, 74 eyes. The mean interval between surgery and refraction measurement was 14.70 months ± 10.80 (SD) (median 13.0 months) and 4.81 ± 4.97 months (median 2.0 months), respectively. Postoperatively, there was no statistically significant between-group difference in the following mean values: refractive prediction error, -0.05 ± 0.64 versus -0.04 ± 0.52 (P = .905); mean absolute error, 0.46 ± 0.44 versus 0.38 ± 0.36 (P = .258); median absolute error, 0.32 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17, 0.67) versus 0.28 (IQR, 0.13, 0.54) (P = .297). Subgroup analysis also did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION: The long-term postoperative refractive outcomes of phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification alone were not significantly different in eyes with OAG, regardless of preoperative AL.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app