Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Equivocal (HER2 IHC 2+) breast carcinomas: gene-protein assay testing reveals association between genetic heterogeneity, individual cell amplification status and potential treatment benefits.

Histopathology 2018 August 17
AIMS: Genetic heterogeneity can pose a challenge to identifying eligible cases for targeted therapy in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ breast carcinoma group. In this study, we characterized this subset of tumors according to clinicopathological parameters.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed 1000 tumor cells per case and recorded the number of HER2 and chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) copies using gene-protein assay slides. HER2 status was determined based on ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines. Tumors with 5% to 50% of cancer cells with amplification were considered to be heterogeneous, whereas those with >50% were considered to be non-heterogeneous. In a study cohort of 110 HER2 IHC 2+ carcinomas, 93 (84.5%) were non-amplified, 12 (10.9%) were amplified, and 5 (4.5%) were ISH equivocal. All of the HER2-amplified and 2 of ISH-equivocal cases (12.7%) corresponded to non-heterogeneous tumors, with highly significant differences evident in the average HER2/CEP17 ratio (p=0.0002) and the proportion of cells with HER2 >6 copies (p<0.0001) compared with heterogeneous lesions. NST grade 3 and HER2-amplified carcinomas average HER2/CEP17 ratio correlated with an increased number of cells with HER2/CEP17 ≥2.0 (p<0.014). Triple-negative CEP17 polysomic carcinomas showed increased metastatic capacity (p=0.003) compared with other tumor types.

CONCLUSION: Non-heterogeneous HER2 IHC 2+ tumors tend to be HER2-amplified. Adding the percentage of cells with HER2 >6 copies to the average HER2/CEP17 ratio may facilitate assessment of amplification status in ISH-equivocal cases. The proportion of cells with HER2/CEP17≥2.0 contributes information about the actual average HER2/CEP17 ratio, depending on tumor type. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app