We have located links that may give you full text access.
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Neal and Griffin's safety performance scale.
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics : JOSE 2018 September 8
INTRODUCTION: Neal and Griffin's safety performance scale is an appropriate tool to evaluate safety performance. This article was validated and relied on the Persian version of Neal and Griffin's scale as the widely used tool to assess safety performance.
METHODS: Neal and Griffin's scale has eight questions and two dimensions - safety compliance and safety participation. A back-forward method was used to translate the original English version into Persian. A total of 161 employees of a petrochemical complex were selected for data collection. Content validity, Cronbach's α and split-half methods, concurrent validity and confirmatory factor analysis were used for psychometric evaluation.
RESULTS: The content validity index and content validity ratio were 0.82 and 0.84, respectively. Cronbach's α for total items was 0.9, indicating a high consistency. Additionally, Cronbach's α values for safety compliance and safety participation were 0.87 and 0.83, respectively. Spearman's correlation coefficients indicated a positive correlation between safety performance and safety culture items (r = 0.182-0.852, p < 0.01). Goodness-of-fit indexes in the default model had poor values. Thus, these values were improved in the modified model.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that Neal and Griffin's scale could be a reliable tool to evaluate preventive measures of safety performance among Iranian workers.
METHODS: Neal and Griffin's scale has eight questions and two dimensions - safety compliance and safety participation. A back-forward method was used to translate the original English version into Persian. A total of 161 employees of a petrochemical complex were selected for data collection. Content validity, Cronbach's α and split-half methods, concurrent validity and confirmatory factor analysis were used for psychometric evaluation.
RESULTS: The content validity index and content validity ratio were 0.82 and 0.84, respectively. Cronbach's α for total items was 0.9, indicating a high consistency. Additionally, Cronbach's α values for safety compliance and safety participation were 0.87 and 0.83, respectively. Spearman's correlation coefficients indicated a positive correlation between safety performance and safety culture items (r = 0.182-0.852, p < 0.01). Goodness-of-fit indexes in the default model had poor values. Thus, these values were improved in the modified model.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that Neal and Griffin's scale could be a reliable tool to evaluate preventive measures of safety performance among Iranian workers.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app