We have located links that may give you full text access.
Relative impact characteristic curve: a graphical tool to visualize and quantify the clinical utility and population-level consequences of implementing markers.
Annals of Epidemiology 2018 July 31
PURPOSE: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is a popular method for evaluating the performance of (bio)markers. However, the standard ROC curve does not directly connect marker performance to patient-related outcomes. Our aim was to fill this gap by proposing a conceptually similar graphical tool that carries information about the clinical uitility of markers.
METHODS: We propose a novel graphical tool, the relative impact characteristic (RIC) curve, that depicts the trade-off between the population-level impact of treatment as a function of the size of the treated population for a given marker positivity rule (e.g., a threshold). We establish analogies between the ROC and the RIC curves around the interpretations of shape, slopes, and area under the curve and discuss parametric inference on RIC.
RESULTS: As a case study, we used data from a clinical trial on preventive therapy for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We illustrate how the RIC curve can be constructed for a predication score and be interpreted in terms of a marker's ability toward concentrating treatment benefit in the population. We discuss hoe the RIC curve can be used to identify a threshold on the risk score based on the maximal acceptable number-needed-to-treat.
CONCLUSIONS: The RIC curve enables evaluation of markers in terms of their treatment-related clinical utility. Its analogies with the standard ROC analysis can facilitate its interpretation, bringing a population-based perspective to the activities of diverse marker development and evaluation teams.
METHODS: We propose a novel graphical tool, the relative impact characteristic (RIC) curve, that depicts the trade-off between the population-level impact of treatment as a function of the size of the treated population for a given marker positivity rule (e.g., a threshold). We establish analogies between the ROC and the RIC curves around the interpretations of shape, slopes, and area under the curve and discuss parametric inference on RIC.
RESULTS: As a case study, we used data from a clinical trial on preventive therapy for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We illustrate how the RIC curve can be constructed for a predication score and be interpreted in terms of a marker's ability toward concentrating treatment benefit in the population. We discuss hoe the RIC curve can be used to identify a threshold on the risk score based on the maximal acceptable number-needed-to-treat.
CONCLUSIONS: The RIC curve enables evaluation of markers in terms of their treatment-related clinical utility. Its analogies with the standard ROC analysis can facilitate its interpretation, bringing a population-based perspective to the activities of diverse marker development and evaluation teams.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app