Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Surgery 2018 November
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are a common postoperative complication after abdominal surgery. Although impervious plastic wound protectors have been used in surgery to reduce surgical site infection rates, the effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors for reduction of surgical site infections remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infection rates after abdominal surgery.

METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating surgical site infection risk after abdominal surgeries with and without the use of impervious plastic wound protectors. The outcome of interest was a well-specified, clinically based definition of surgical site infections. No language or time restrictions were applied. The pooled risk ratio was estimated with random-effect meta-analysis. The quality assessment of the studies and the quantitative analyses were performed in line with the principles of the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS: Of the 400 studies identified, 14 randomized controlled trials representing 2,684 patients were included in this review. The pooled risk ratio under a random-effects model was 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.96; I2 , 56.8%), indicating a potentially significant benefit from impervious plastic wound protector use. There was a significant trend toward greater protective effect in studies using a dual ring protector (relative risk = 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.58), rather than a single ring protector (relative risk = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.00). There was no significant between-study heterogeneity or publication bias.

CONCLUSION: This study suggests that impervious plastic wound protectors are efficient in reducing surgical site infection rates in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app