Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Factors associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery in ART pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of medical and obstetrical factors on the odds of cesarean delivery, comparing assisted reproductive technology (ART)-treated women and women with subfertility not treated with ART versus fertile women.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.

SETTING: Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): Singleton deliveries to primiparous women; with the source of this data being the Massachusetts vital and hospital records linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data (2004-2010).

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mode of delivery.

RESULT(S): The 173,130 deliveries included 5,768 ART-treated, 2,657 subfertile (1,627 non-ART medically assisted reproduction [MAR] and 1,030 unassisted infertile), and 164,705 fertile pregnancies and 117,743 vaginal and 55,387 cesarean deliveries. ART-treated women were older, more often white and non-Hispanic, and with more private insurance, previous uterine surgery, gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, bleeding, and placental complications than fertile women. Overall rates of cesarean delivery were 45.7%, 43.3%, and 31.1% for ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile women and 41.7% and 45.9% for MAR and unassisted infertile deliveries. When adjusted for demographics, underlying medical factors, previous uterine surgery, and placental and delivery complications, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) compared with fertile women were 1.27 for ART-treated and 1.15 for subfertile women, with greater odds among unassisted infertile (OR 1.26) but not MAR (OR 1.09) women. The strongest confounders of odds of cesarean delivery were age and previous uterine surgery.

CONCLUSION(S): ART and unassisted infertility were associated with greater odds of cesarean compared with fertile women. Underlying medical and obstetrical risks had strong confounding effects strongly attenuating the odds for cesarean delivery.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app