We have located links that may give you full text access.
The durability of adhesion to Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated enamel.
Laser Therapy 2018 June 31
Background and aims: Adhesion durability of resin adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiated-enamel has been rarely investigated in the literature. Thus, the present study evaluated the influence of long-term water storage (12-month) on resin bond strength with the enamel irradiated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation deployed different settings.
Materials and methods: The flattened enamel samples of 35 bovine teeth, which were embedded into acrylic blocks, were randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 5), according to surface treatments using Er,Cr:YSGG laser with different parameters 6 W/20 Hz, 6 W/35 Hz, 6 W/50 Hz, 3 W/20 Hz, 3 W/35 Hz, 3 W/50 Hz or no laser treatment (Bur-treating as a control). Adper Single Bond 2 was applied to the prepared enamel and the composites were placed and cured. Resin-enamel sticks with an approximate cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm2 were obtained, and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) tests were performed at 24-hour and 12-month of water storage after bonding. The µTBS data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05).
Results: 24-hour water storage after bonding, the µTBS to laser-irradiated enamel in the 6W/ 20 Hz group was significantly lower than those of bur-treated. However, 3 W/50 Hz showed significantly higher µTBS than those of bur-treated. Two-way ANOVA revealed that 12-month water storage did not influenced µTBS.
Conclusion: It may be concluded that, initial bond strength to Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiated-enamel might be significantly influenced by power and pulse frequency settings. However, resin bonding to laser-irradiated enamel was stable over 12-month water storage regardless of tested laser parameters.
Materials and methods: The flattened enamel samples of 35 bovine teeth, which were embedded into acrylic blocks, were randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 5), according to surface treatments using Er,Cr:YSGG laser with different parameters 6 W/20 Hz, 6 W/35 Hz, 6 W/50 Hz, 3 W/20 Hz, 3 W/35 Hz, 3 W/50 Hz or no laser treatment (Bur-treating as a control). Adper Single Bond 2 was applied to the prepared enamel and the composites were placed and cured. Resin-enamel sticks with an approximate cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm2 were obtained, and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) tests were performed at 24-hour and 12-month of water storage after bonding. The µTBS data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05).
Results: 24-hour water storage after bonding, the µTBS to laser-irradiated enamel in the 6W/ 20 Hz group was significantly lower than those of bur-treated. However, 3 W/50 Hz showed significantly higher µTBS than those of bur-treated. Two-way ANOVA revealed that 12-month water storage did not influenced µTBS.
Conclusion: It may be concluded that, initial bond strength to Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiated-enamel might be significantly influenced by power and pulse frequency settings. However, resin bonding to laser-irradiated enamel was stable over 12-month water storage regardless of tested laser parameters.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app