Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Frequency of Appropriate and Low-Risk Noncardiac Preoperative Stress Testing Across Medical Specialties.

Preoperative stress testing in asymptomatic patients is considered rarely appropriate in patients with: (1) moderate to good functional capacity (≥4 metabolic equivalent (METs)), (2) no clinical risk factors, or who are (3) asymptomatic after revascularization, normal stress test, or normal coronary angiography within 1 year. Preoperative stress testing is also not recommended in patients at low risk (<1%) for adverse cardiac events. We investigated the frequency of rarely appropriate and low-risk preoperative stress testing across medical specialties at our institution in asymptomatic patients when applying appropriate use criteria and two different perioperative risk models. We reviewed preoperative stress tests for noncardiac surgeries performed at Hershey Medical Center from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. Perioperative cardiac risk was estimated using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest risk calculator and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. We analyzed 501 preoperative stress tests meeting the study criteria. When applying appropriate use criteria, we found that 336 of 501 studies (67%) were rarely appropriate. When applying the risk score models, 369 of 501 studies (74%) were determined to be low risk by the RCRI (RCRI score ≤1), and 248 of 361 stress tests (69%) were determined to be low risk by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest risk calculator. Low risk and rarely appropriate preoperative stress testing was common across all ordering specialties reviewed. In conclusion, these findings suggest that preoperative stress testing is broadly overused in asymptomatic patients and that interventions to reduce rarely appropriate and low-risk preoperative stress testing require a multispecialty approach.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app